Sticky Cost Drivers: An Analytical Study of Cost Stickiness’ Causes

Sameh Abdelsalam Mustafa
{"title":"Sticky Cost Drivers: An Analytical Study of Cost Stickiness’ Causes","authors":"Sameh Abdelsalam Mustafa","doi":"10.21608/cfdj.2022.229761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study provides an analytical study of the causes of sticky cost behavior from the perspective of both the deliberate decision theory and the cost adjustment delay theory. In the traditional model of cost behavior, the relationship betw een cost and activity volume is independent of managers’ decisions, but the ABJ model presented by Anderson, Banker and Janakiraman (2003) demonstrated the role of managerial decisions in cost behavior. This means that cost stickiness is not an inevitable phenomenon but rather a result of managers’ decisions whether intentional, unintended or inappropriate. Moreover, company policies, ownership structure, and social legislation may affect the cost stickiness. Using the desk research method, the author relied on previous literature to determine and categorize the cost stickiness’ drivers. According to the theory of deliberate decision, the author distinction between the potential drivers of cost stickiness resulting from managers’ decisions, and the drivers related to the firm. In addition, the cost may become sticky due to the inability of cost to keep pace with declining sales. According to cost adjustment delay theory, managers keep the unused resources until it is assured of a continued decline in demand or based on their expectations for a future sale, but in the long run, prices, wages, and expectations are fully adapted to the state of the markets and economy, reducing cost stickiness. This study has implications for researchers by enhancing their understanding of the sticky cost drivers.","PeriodicalId":354519,"journal":{"name":"المجلة العلمیة للدراسات والبحوث المالیة والتجاریة","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"المجلة العلمیة للدراسات والبحوث المالیة والتجاریة","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/cfdj.2022.229761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The current study provides an analytical study of the causes of sticky cost behavior from the perspective of both the deliberate decision theory and the cost adjustment delay theory. In the traditional model of cost behavior, the relationship betw een cost and activity volume is independent of managers’ decisions, but the ABJ model presented by Anderson, Banker and Janakiraman (2003) demonstrated the role of managerial decisions in cost behavior. This means that cost stickiness is not an inevitable phenomenon but rather a result of managers’ decisions whether intentional, unintended or inappropriate. Moreover, company policies, ownership structure, and social legislation may affect the cost stickiness. Using the desk research method, the author relied on previous literature to determine and categorize the cost stickiness’ drivers. According to the theory of deliberate decision, the author distinction between the potential drivers of cost stickiness resulting from managers’ decisions, and the drivers related to the firm. In addition, the cost may become sticky due to the inability of cost to keep pace with declining sales. According to cost adjustment delay theory, managers keep the unused resources until it is assured of a continued decline in demand or based on their expectations for a future sale, but in the long run, prices, wages, and expectations are fully adapted to the state of the markets and economy, reducing cost stickiness. This study has implications for researchers by enhancing their understanding of the sticky cost drivers.
粘性成本动因:成本粘性成因分析研究
本研究从刻意决策理论和成本调整延迟理论两方面对粘性成本行为的成因进行了分析研究。在传统的成本行为模型中,成本与作业量之间的关系独立于管理者的决策,但Anderson、Banker和Janakiraman(2003)提出的ABJ模型证明了管理决策在成本行为中的作用。这意味着成本粘性不是一种不可避免的现象,而是管理者有意、无意或不恰当决策的结果。此外,公司政策、股权结构和社会立法都可能影响成本粘性。采用桌面研究法,笔者依靠以往的文献来确定和分类成本粘性的驱动因素。根据刻意决策理论,作者区分了由管理者决策产生的成本粘性的潜在驱动因素和与企业相关的驱动因素。此外,由于成本无法跟上销售下降的步伐,成本可能会变得粘性。根据成本调整延迟理论,管理者保留未使用的资源,直到确定需求持续下降或基于对未来销售的预期,但从长期来看,价格、工资和预期完全适应了市场和经济状况,降低了成本粘性。本研究对研究人员加深对粘性成本驱动因素的理解具有一定的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信