Position paper: Sapper -- a language for provable hardware policy enforcement

Xun Li, Vineeth Kashyap, J. Oberg, Mohit Tiwari, Vasanth Ram Rajarathinam, R. Kastner, T. Sherwood, B. Hardekopf, F. Chong
{"title":"Position paper: Sapper -- a language for provable hardware policy enforcement","authors":"Xun Li, Vineeth Kashyap, J. Oberg, Mohit Tiwari, Vasanth Ram Rajarathinam, R. Kastner, T. Sherwood, B. Hardekopf, F. Chong","doi":"10.1145/2465106.2465214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe Sapper, a language for creating critical hardware components that have provably secure information flow. Most systems that enforce information flow policies place the hardware microarchitecture within the trusted computing base, and also assume that the observable behavior of that microarchitecture is fully and correctly documented. However, the reality is that this behavior is incompletely (and sometimes incorrectly) specified, and that the microarchitecture itself often contains implementation bugs. This fact means that all such systems are vulnerable to attack by exploiting undocumented or buggy hardware features. Sapper addresses this problem by enabling flexible and efficient hardware design that is provably secure with respect to a given information flow policy. Sapper uses a hybrid approach that leverages unique language features and static analysis to determine a set of dynamic checks that are automatically inserted into the hardware design. These checks are provably sufficient to guarantee that the resulting hardware prevents all explicit, implicit, and timing channels even if the hardware is otherwise buggy or poorly documented.","PeriodicalId":119000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2465106.2465214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We describe Sapper, a language for creating critical hardware components that have provably secure information flow. Most systems that enforce information flow policies place the hardware microarchitecture within the trusted computing base, and also assume that the observable behavior of that microarchitecture is fully and correctly documented. However, the reality is that this behavior is incompletely (and sometimes incorrectly) specified, and that the microarchitecture itself often contains implementation bugs. This fact means that all such systems are vulnerable to attack by exploiting undocumented or buggy hardware features. Sapper addresses this problem by enabling flexible and efficient hardware design that is provably secure with respect to a given information flow policy. Sapper uses a hybrid approach that leverages unique language features and static analysis to determine a set of dynamic checks that are automatically inserted into the hardware design. These checks are provably sufficient to guarantee that the resulting hardware prevents all explicit, implicit, and timing channels even if the hardware is otherwise buggy or poorly documented.
立场文件:Sapper——一种可证明的硬件策略执行语言
我们将描述Sapper,这是一种用于创建具有可证明的安全信息流的关键硬件组件的语言。大多数执行信息流策略的系统都将硬件微体系结构置于可信计算基础中,并且还假定该微体系结构的可观察行为得到了完整和正确的记录。然而,实际情况是这种行为没有被完全(有时是不正确的)指定,而且微体系结构本身经常包含实现错误。这一事实意味着所有此类系统都容易受到利用未记录或有缺陷的硬件特性的攻击。Sapper通过实现灵活高效的硬件设计来解决这个问题,这种硬件设计对于给定的信息流策略来说是安全的。Sapper使用一种混合方法,利用独特的语言特性和静态分析来确定一组自动插入硬件设计的动态检查。这些检查足以保证生成的硬件能够防止所有显式、隐式和定时通道,即使硬件在其他方面存在错误或文档记录不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信