Preliminary Results for Subpopulation Algorithm Based on Novelty (SAN) Compared with the State of the Art

Yuzi Jiang, Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas
{"title":"Preliminary Results for Subpopulation Algorithm Based on Novelty (SAN) Compared with the State of the Art","authors":"Yuzi Jiang, Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas","doi":"10.1109/CYBCONF51991.2021.9464153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subpopulation algorithm based on novelty (SAN) has been investigated for some time and proved that it can be used for multi-objective optimization problems. It outperforms subpopulation algorithm based on general differential evolution (SAGDE) under the same framework, which highlights its special intrinsic mechanism. This intrinsic mechanism has something in common with some state-of-the-art multi-objective optimization algorithms. However, SAN has not yet proved its ability to be better than these algorithms and has not proven its ability to optimize problems with more than 5 objectives. In this paper, the advantage of SAN over other subpopulation algorithms, i.e., novelty search, is presented in detail. The similarities and differences between the intrinsic mechanisms of SAN, nondominated sorting genetic algorithm series (NSGAs) and multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) are also analyzed. Finally, these three algorithms are evaluated on several well-known benchmark problems with more than two objectives. The result shows SAN surpassed NSGA-III (latest version in NSGAs) in 20 out of the 32 problems, surpassed MOEA/D in 26 problems in 10 runs, which preliminary proved it surpasses the State-of-the-Art.","PeriodicalId":231194,"journal":{"name":"2021 5th IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 5th IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBCONF51991.2021.9464153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Subpopulation algorithm based on novelty (SAN) has been investigated for some time and proved that it can be used for multi-objective optimization problems. It outperforms subpopulation algorithm based on general differential evolution (SAGDE) under the same framework, which highlights its special intrinsic mechanism. This intrinsic mechanism has something in common with some state-of-the-art multi-objective optimization algorithms. However, SAN has not yet proved its ability to be better than these algorithms and has not proven its ability to optimize problems with more than 5 objectives. In this paper, the advantage of SAN over other subpopulation algorithms, i.e., novelty search, is presented in detail. The similarities and differences between the intrinsic mechanisms of SAN, nondominated sorting genetic algorithm series (NSGAs) and multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) are also analyzed. Finally, these three algorithms are evaluated on several well-known benchmark problems with more than two objectives. The result shows SAN surpassed NSGA-III (latest version in NSGAs) in 20 out of the 32 problems, surpassed MOEA/D in 26 problems in 10 runs, which preliminary proved it surpasses the State-of-the-Art.
基于新颖性(SAN)的亚种群算法与现有算法比较的初步结果
基于新颖性(SAN)的子种群算法已经被研究了一段时间,并证明了它可以用于多目标优化问题。在相同的框架下,它优于基于一般差分进化(SAGDE)的子种群算法,突出了其特殊的内在机制。这种内在机制与一些最先进的多目标优化算法有一些共同之处。然而,SAN还没有证明它比这些算法更好的能力,也没有证明它有能力优化超过5个目标的问题。本文详细介绍了SAN算法相对于其他子种群算法的优势,即新颖性搜索。分析了SAN、非支配排序遗传算法系列(NSGAs)和基于分解的多目标进化算法(MOEA/D)内在机制的异同。最后,在几个具有两个以上目标的著名基准问题上对这三种算法进行了评估。结果显示,SAN在32个问题中有20个问题超过了NSGA-III (nsga的最新版本),在10次运行中有26个问题超过了MOEA/D,初步证明了它超越了最先进的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信