File system trace replay methods through the lens of metrology

T. Pereira, F. Brasileiro, Lívia M. R. Sampaio
{"title":"File system trace replay methods through the lens of metrology","authors":"T. Pereira, F. Brasileiro, Lívia M. R. Sampaio","doi":"10.1109/MSST.2016.7897090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are various methods to evaluate the performance of file systems through the replay of file system traces. Despite this diversity, little attention was given on comparing the alternatives, thus bringing some skepticism about the results attained using these methods. In this paper, to fill this understanding gap, we analyze two popular trace replay methods through the lens of metrology. This case study indicates that the evaluated methods provide similar, good precision but are biased in some scenarios. Our results identified limitations in the implementation of the replay tool as well as flaws in the established practices to experiment with trace replayers as the root causes of the measurement bias. After improving the implementation of the trace replayer and discarding inappropriate experimental practices, we were able to reduce the bias, leading to lower measurement uncertainty. Finally, our case study also shows that, in some cases, collecting only the file system activity is not enough to accurately replay the traces; in these cases, collecting resource consumption information, such as the amount of allocated memory, can improve the quality of trace replay methods.","PeriodicalId":299251,"journal":{"name":"2016 32nd Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 32nd Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSST.2016.7897090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

There are various methods to evaluate the performance of file systems through the replay of file system traces. Despite this diversity, little attention was given on comparing the alternatives, thus bringing some skepticism about the results attained using these methods. In this paper, to fill this understanding gap, we analyze two popular trace replay methods through the lens of metrology. This case study indicates that the evaluated methods provide similar, good precision but are biased in some scenarios. Our results identified limitations in the implementation of the replay tool as well as flaws in the established practices to experiment with trace replayers as the root causes of the measurement bias. After improving the implementation of the trace replayer and discarding inappropriate experimental practices, we were able to reduce the bias, leading to lower measurement uncertainty. Finally, our case study also shows that, in some cases, collecting only the file system activity is not enough to accurately replay the traces; in these cases, collecting resource consumption information, such as the amount of allocated memory, can improve the quality of trace replay methods.
文件系统跟踪重播方法通过镜头计量
通过重放文件系统跟踪来评估文件系统的性能有多种方法。尽管存在这种多样性,但很少注意比较替代方案,从而对使用这些方法获得的结果产生一些怀疑。为了填补这一认识空白,本文从计量的角度分析了两种流行的轨迹回放方法。该案例研究表明,所评估的方法提供了相似的,良好的精度,但在某些情况下存在偏差。我们的研究结果确定了重播工具实现的局限性,以及在使用跟踪重播进行实验的既定实践中的缺陷,这是测量偏差的根本原因。在改进了痕量重放器的实现并抛弃了不适当的实验实践后,我们能够减少偏差,从而降低测量不确定度。最后,我们的案例研究还表明,在某些情况下,仅收集文件系统活动不足以准确地重放跟踪;在这些情况下,收集资源消耗信息(例如分配的内存量)可以提高跟踪重放方法的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信