Assessing the Economics of Residential Electricity Tariff Selection

Frederik vom Scheidt, P. Staudt, Christof Weinhardt
{"title":"Assessing the Economics of Residential Electricity Tariff Selection","authors":"Frederik vom Scheidt, P. Staudt, Christof Weinhardt","doi":"10.1109/SEST.2019.8849143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As residential customers become a more integral part of the electricity system the importance of electricity tariffs increases. The widespread adoption of new, economically efficient tariffs for residential customers can yield substantial system benefits. However, in liberalized electricity markets tariffs are selected by each individual household. System-beneficial tariffs do not necessarily bring private benefits for each household. Therefore, it is important to enable households to make well-informed decisions about which tariff to select. Assistance for such decisions can come from adequate Decision Support Tools which have been called for from the European Commission. To this end we design a set of six tariffs, based on empirical data: four different time-of-use (TOU) tariffs, one real-time pricing (RTP) tariff, and a benchmark tariff with a flat, invariant price (Flat). Applying the tariffs to a consumption data set of more than 100,000 customers we find that for a small share of customers electricity bills vary substantially under different tariffs. We present and evaluate a naive approach which recommends an annual tariff to each household, based on information from one month. We find that the performance of this naive classifier differs strongly between tariffs. Finally, we assess the economic consequences of false tariff selection and find that overall economic risks are highest for the RTP tariff.","PeriodicalId":158839,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEST.2019.8849143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

As residential customers become a more integral part of the electricity system the importance of electricity tariffs increases. The widespread adoption of new, economically efficient tariffs for residential customers can yield substantial system benefits. However, in liberalized electricity markets tariffs are selected by each individual household. System-beneficial tariffs do not necessarily bring private benefits for each household. Therefore, it is important to enable households to make well-informed decisions about which tariff to select. Assistance for such decisions can come from adequate Decision Support Tools which have been called for from the European Commission. To this end we design a set of six tariffs, based on empirical data: four different time-of-use (TOU) tariffs, one real-time pricing (RTP) tariff, and a benchmark tariff with a flat, invariant price (Flat). Applying the tariffs to a consumption data set of more than 100,000 customers we find that for a small share of customers electricity bills vary substantially under different tariffs. We present and evaluate a naive approach which recommends an annual tariff to each household, based on information from one month. We find that the performance of this naive classifier differs strongly between tariffs. Finally, we assess the economic consequences of false tariff selection and find that overall economic risks are highest for the RTP tariff.
住宅电价选择的经济性评估
随着住宅用户成为电力系统中越来越重要的一部分,电价的重要性也在增加。广泛采用新的、经济高效的住宅用户电价可以产生可观的系统效益。然而,在开放的电力市场中,电价是由每个家庭选择的。对系统有利的关税不一定会给每个家庭带来私人利益。因此,重要的是使家庭能够就选择哪种关税做出明智的决定。欧洲委员会已要求适当的决策支持工具为此类决策提供协助。为此,我们根据经验数据设计了一套六种电价:四种不同的分时电价(TOU)、一种实时定价(RTP)和一种具有统一不变价格(flat)的基准电价。将这些电价应用于超过10万客户的消费数据集,我们发现,对于一小部分客户来说,不同电价下的电费差异很大。我们提出并评估了一种幼稚的方法,该方法根据一个月的信息向每个家庭推荐年度关税。我们发现这种朴素分类器的性能在关税之间有很大差异。最后,我们评估了错误关税选择的经济后果,发现RTP关税的整体经济风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信