Non-Omega-Overlapping TRSs are UN

Stefan Kahrs, Connor Smith
{"title":"Non-Omega-Overlapping TRSs are UN","authors":"Stefan Kahrs, Connor Smith","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper solves problem #79 of RTA's list of open \nproblems --- in the positive. If the rules of a TRS do not overlap w.r.t. \nsubstitutions of infinite terms then the TRS has unique normal forms. \nWe solve the problem by reducing the problem to one of consistency for \n\"similar\" constructor term rewriting systems. For this we introduce \na new proof technique. We define a relation ⇓ that is \nconsistent by construction, and which --- if transitive --- would \ncoincide with the rewrite system's equivalence relation =R. \n \nWe then prove the transitivity of ⇓ by coalgebraic \nreasoning. Any concrete proof for instances of this relation only \nrefers to terms of some finite coalgebra, and we then construct an \nequivalence relation on that coalgebra which coincides with ⇓.","PeriodicalId":284975,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2016.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper solves problem #79 of RTA's list of open problems --- in the positive. If the rules of a TRS do not overlap w.r.t. substitutions of infinite terms then the TRS has unique normal forms. We solve the problem by reducing the problem to one of consistency for "similar" constructor term rewriting systems. For this we introduce a new proof technique. We define a relation ⇓ that is consistent by construction, and which --- if transitive --- would coincide with the rewrite system's equivalence relation =R. We then prove the transitivity of ⇓ by coalgebraic reasoning. Any concrete proof for instances of this relation only refers to terms of some finite coalgebra, and we then construct an equivalence relation on that coalgebra which coincides with ⇓.
非重叠trs是UN
本文解决了RTA开放问题列表中的第79个问题——正面问题。如果TRS的规则与无限项的替换不重叠,则TRS具有唯一的范式。我们通过将问题简化为“相似”构造函数项重写系统的一致性问题来解决这个问题。为此,我们引入了一种新的证明技术。我们定义了一个关系,该关系在构造上是一致的,并且——如果传递的话——将与重写系统的等价关系=R重合。然后我们用共代数推理证明了全文的可传递性。对于这种关系的实例的任何具体证明,只涉及到某些有限协代数的项,然后我们在该有限协代数上构造一个等价关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信