FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN TIMES OF COVID-19: CHILLING EFFECT IN HUNGARY AND SERBIA

Kristina Cendic, Gergely Gosztonyi
{"title":"FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN TIMES OF COVID-19: CHILLING EFFECT IN HUNGARY AND SERBIA","authors":"Kristina Cendic, Gergely Gosztonyi","doi":"10.47305/jlia2060014c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technologies have opened several risks to safety of journalists. More importantly, in the state of emergency caused by the Covid-19 outbreak, journalists and media actors have shifted their activities online more than ever, which also made them more prone to digital threats and attacks. In some regimes there are even organized intimidation campaigns against political opponents causing chilling effect and self-censorship, and jeopardizing freedom of expression in general. Hungary as a member of the European Union since 2004 and Serbia as a leading candidate to join the EU are two countries where the problems and concerns about media freedom is growing every day. The fear from the unknown during the international pandemic gave opportunity to some governments to hide their real political agendas and cover their desire for the 'good-old-fashioned' censorship. The number of countries where some kind of censorship could be found is growing every day. The authors will show two country-case-studies from Hungary and Serbia, where the leaders and the political situations are very similar and could show a (good or bad) example to other countries that would like to follow the illiberal views on media issues.","PeriodicalId":299340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47305/jlia2060014c","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

New technologies have opened several risks to safety of journalists. More importantly, in the state of emergency caused by the Covid-19 outbreak, journalists and media actors have shifted their activities online more than ever, which also made them more prone to digital threats and attacks. In some regimes there are even organized intimidation campaigns against political opponents causing chilling effect and self-censorship, and jeopardizing freedom of expression in general. Hungary as a member of the European Union since 2004 and Serbia as a leading candidate to join the EU are two countries where the problems and concerns about media freedom is growing every day. The fear from the unknown during the international pandemic gave opportunity to some governments to hide their real political agendas and cover their desire for the 'good-old-fashioned' censorship. The number of countries where some kind of censorship could be found is growing every day. The authors will show two country-case-studies from Hungary and Serbia, where the leaders and the political situations are very similar and could show a (good or bad) example to other countries that would like to follow the illiberal views on media issues.
2019冠状病毒病时期的言论自由:匈牙利和塞尔维亚的寒蝉效应
新技术给记者的安全带来了一些风险。更重要的是,在新冠肺炎疫情造成的紧急状态下,记者和媒体行为者比以往任何时候都更多地将活动转移到网上,这也使他们更容易受到数字威胁和攻击。在一些政权中,甚至有组织地对政治对手进行恐吓运动,造成寒蝉效应和自我审查,并损害一般的言论自由。匈牙利自2004年起成为欧盟成员国,塞尔维亚是加入欧盟的主要候选国,这两个国家对媒体自由的问题和担忧与日俱增。在国际大流行期间,对未知的恐惧使一些政府有机会隐藏他们真正的政治议程,掩盖他们对“老式”审查制度的渴望。存在某种审查制度的国家数量每天都在增加。作者将展示匈牙利和塞尔维亚的两个国家案例研究,这两个国家的领导人和政治局势非常相似,可以为其他想要在媒体问题上遵循狭隘观点的国家提供(好或坏)榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信