Average consensus algorithms robust against channel noise

L. Pescosolido, S. Barbarossa, G. Scutari
{"title":"Average consensus algorithms robust against channel noise","authors":"L. Pescosolido, S. Barbarossa, G. Scutari","doi":"10.1109/SPAWC.2008.4641610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Average consensus algorithms have attracted popularity in the wireless sensor network scenario as a simple way to compute linear combinations of the observations gathered by the sensors, in a totally decentralized fashion, i.e., without a fusion center. However, average consensus techniques involve the iterated exchange of data among sensors. In a practical implementation, this interaction is affected by noise. The goal of this paper is to bring some common adaptive signal processing techniques into the sensor network context in order to robustify the iterative exchange of data against communication noise. In particular, we will compare the performance of two algorithms: (a) a method, reminiscent of stochastic approximation algorithms, using a decreasing step size, with proper decaying law, and (b) a leakage method imposing that the consensus cannot be too distant from the initial measurements. We provide a theoretical analysis, validated by simulation results, of both methods to show how to derive the best tradeoff between the system parameters in order to get the minimum estimation variance, taking into account both observation and interaction noise.","PeriodicalId":197154,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE 9th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE 9th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPAWC.2008.4641610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Average consensus algorithms have attracted popularity in the wireless sensor network scenario as a simple way to compute linear combinations of the observations gathered by the sensors, in a totally decentralized fashion, i.e., without a fusion center. However, average consensus techniques involve the iterated exchange of data among sensors. In a practical implementation, this interaction is affected by noise. The goal of this paper is to bring some common adaptive signal processing techniques into the sensor network context in order to robustify the iterative exchange of data against communication noise. In particular, we will compare the performance of two algorithms: (a) a method, reminiscent of stochastic approximation algorithms, using a decreasing step size, with proper decaying law, and (b) a leakage method imposing that the consensus cannot be too distant from the initial measurements. We provide a theoretical analysis, validated by simulation results, of both methods to show how to derive the best tradeoff between the system parameters in order to get the minimum estimation variance, taking into account both observation and interaction noise.
平均一致性算法对信道噪声具有鲁棒性
平均共识算法在无线传感器网络场景中很受欢迎,因为它是一种简单的方法,可以以完全分散的方式计算传感器收集的观测值的线性组合,即没有融合中心。然而,平均共识技术涉及传感器之间的数据迭代交换。在实际实现中,这种交互会受到噪声的影响。本文的目的是将一些常见的自适应信号处理技术引入传感器网络环境,以增强数据迭代交换对通信噪声的鲁棒性。特别是,我们将比较两种算法的性能:(a)一种方法,让人想起随机逼近算法,使用递减的步长,具有适当的衰减律,以及(b)一种泄漏方法,强制要求共识不能离初始测量值太远。我们对这两种方法进行了理论分析,并通过仿真结果进行了验证,以展示如何在考虑观测和交互噪声的情况下,在系统参数之间得出最佳权衡,以获得最小的估计方差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信