Clean Energy and the Price Preemption Ceiling

Jim Rossi
{"title":"Clean Energy and the Price Preemption Ceiling","authors":"Jim Rossi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1899026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the New Deal, federal preemption has precluded many state and local regulatory decisions that depart from wholesale electric prices determined under federal standards. Recent decisions treat prices that meet the federal standard as a preemption ceiling, which prohibits states from setting prices that exceed the wholesale price set in a competitive market. Both appellate courts and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) - the primary federal agency responsible for the electric power sector - have recently applied a price preemption ceiling to clean energy policies.I argue in this Article that this price ceiling preemption approach hobbles the advancement of clean energy policy under both federal and state laws. State and local governments, along with regional institutions, have adopted a number of clean energy innovations, including feed-in tariffs for renewable power, novel approaches to transmission siting and cost allocation, and energy conservation policies. As subnational governments today consider how to encourage clean energy investments, they are increasingly bumping into limitations imposed by FERC and the courts under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.Imposing a legal preemption ceiling on clean energy prices thwarts the ability of subnational governments to adopt policies that advance conservation and renewable energy goals. I argue that reassessing application of wholesale price ceiling preemption to regional, state and local clean energy innovations will allow courts and federal regulators to more effectively imagine the ability of federal energy laws to advance clean energy goals.","PeriodicalId":388507,"journal":{"name":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1899026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the New Deal, federal preemption has precluded many state and local regulatory decisions that depart from wholesale electric prices determined under federal standards. Recent decisions treat prices that meet the federal standard as a preemption ceiling, which prohibits states from setting prices that exceed the wholesale price set in a competitive market. Both appellate courts and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) - the primary federal agency responsible for the electric power sector - have recently applied a price preemption ceiling to clean energy policies.I argue in this Article that this price ceiling preemption approach hobbles the advancement of clean energy policy under both federal and state laws. State and local governments, along with regional institutions, have adopted a number of clean energy innovations, including feed-in tariffs for renewable power, novel approaches to transmission siting and cost allocation, and energy conservation policies. As subnational governments today consider how to encourage clean energy investments, they are increasingly bumping into limitations imposed by FERC and the courts under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution.Imposing a legal preemption ceiling on clean energy prices thwarts the ability of subnational governments to adopt policies that advance conservation and renewable energy goals. I argue that reassessing application of wholesale price ceiling preemption to regional, state and local clean energy innovations will allow courts and federal regulators to more effectively imagine the ability of federal energy laws to advance clean energy goals.
清洁能源和价格优先上限
自新政以来,联邦政府的优先购买权排除了许多州和地方的监管决定,这些决定偏离了联邦标准确定的批发电价。最近的决定将符合联邦标准的价格视为优先购买权上限,禁止各州设定超过竞争市场中设定的批发价格。上诉法院和联邦能源管理委员会(FERC)——负责电力部门的主要联邦机构——最近对清洁能源政策实行了价格优先上限。我在这篇文章中认为,这种价格上限优先的做法阻碍了联邦和州法律下清洁能源政策的发展。州和地方政府以及地区机构采用了许多清洁能源创新,包括可再生能源的上网电价、输电选址和成本分配的新方法,以及节能政策。随着地方政府考虑如何鼓励清洁能源投资,他们越来越多地遇到联邦能源管理委员会和法院根据美国宪法最高条款施加的限制。对清洁能源价格设置法律上的优先上限,阻碍了地方政府采取促进节能和可再生能源目标的政策。我认为,重新评估批发价格上限优先在地区、州和地方清洁能源创新中的应用,将使法院和联邦监管机构更有效地想象联邦能源法推进清洁能源目标的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信