{"title":"Growth strategies and consumption patterns in transition: From Fordism to finance-driven capitalism","authors":"M. Koch","doi":"10.4337/9781788117814.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two centuries of capitalist growth in Western societies have coincided with significant increases in objective and subjective well-being. Yet these increases have come at a price: the thresholds for specific biophysical processes such as climate, biodiversity and the nitrogen cycle being approached or crossed (Steffen et al., 2015). Attempts to decouple gross domestic product (GDP) growth absolutely from the ecological footprints of production and consumption have not been successful to date (Pichler et al., 2017). Since the material welfare standards enjoyed by rich countries cannot be generalized to the rest of the planet, these countries would thus need to review their production and consumption patterns and ‘degrow’ to make their economies and societies compatible with planetary limits (D’Alisa et al., 2014; Koch and Mont, 2016; Spash, 2017). Indeed, if planetary boundaries are to be taken seriously, only the satisfaction of basic human needs, and not much more, could be assured in the rich countries for the time being (Koch et al., 2017). This chapter seeks to contribute to an institutional understanding of consumption governance through an analysis of how consumption practices are linked to production norms in specific capitalist growth strategies.","PeriodicalId":288143,"journal":{"name":"A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance","volume":"129 Pt 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117814.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Two centuries of capitalist growth in Western societies have coincided with significant increases in objective and subjective well-being. Yet these increases have come at a price: the thresholds for specific biophysical processes such as climate, biodiversity and the nitrogen cycle being approached or crossed (Steffen et al., 2015). Attempts to decouple gross domestic product (GDP) growth absolutely from the ecological footprints of production and consumption have not been successful to date (Pichler et al., 2017). Since the material welfare standards enjoyed by rich countries cannot be generalized to the rest of the planet, these countries would thus need to review their production and consumption patterns and ‘degrow’ to make their economies and societies compatible with planetary limits (D’Alisa et al., 2014; Koch and Mont, 2016; Spash, 2017). Indeed, if planetary boundaries are to be taken seriously, only the satisfaction of basic human needs, and not much more, could be assured in the rich countries for the time being (Koch et al., 2017). This chapter seeks to contribute to an institutional understanding of consumption governance through an analysis of how consumption practices are linked to production norms in specific capitalist growth strategies.
西方社会两个世纪以来资本主义的发展,伴随着人们主观和客观幸福感的显著提高。然而,这些增长是有代价的:气候、生物多样性和氮循环等特定生物物理过程的阈值正在接近或跨越(Steffen et al., 2015)。迄今为止,将国内生产总值(GDP)增长与生产和消费的生态足迹完全脱钩的尝试尚未成功(Pichler et al., 2017)。由于富裕国家享受的物质福利标准不能推广到地球上的其他国家,因此这些国家需要审查其生产和消费模式,并“去增长”,使其经济和社会与地球极限相适应(D ' alisa等人,2014;Koch and Mont, 2016;Spash, 2017)。事实上,如果要认真对待地球边界,富国目前只能保证满足人类的基本需求,而不是更多(Koch et al., 2017)。本章试图通过分析消费实践如何与特定资本主义增长战略中的生产规范联系起来,从而促进对消费治理的制度性理解。