On consolidation as a form of systematic arrangement of legislation

V. Reutov, A. Vankov
{"title":"On consolidation as a form of systematic arrangement of legislation","authors":"V. Reutov, A. Vankov","doi":"10.14420/EN.2013.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The article is focused on the problem of describing the characteris-tics of such forms of the systematic arrangement of legislation as consolidation . The authors observe different points of jurisprudence concerning the problem of categorizing the types of systematic arrangement of laws and regulations, emphasizing the place of consolidation in these studies . The article presents not only the views of modern scholars, but also gives a brief review of pre-revo-lutionary Russian and Soviet literature on the issue . The authors also provide examples of using consolidation in the legal systems of civil law and common law countries .Keywords: consolidation, systematization of legislation, consolidation bills, codification, codes . I n legal theory there are typically three forms (methods) of the systematization of legislation 1 . These are incorporation, consoli-dation and codification . Some sources name record of regula-tions as a fourth form, and the creation of codes of law as a fifth . In this classification, the description of the types is made according to the level of complexity (depth) of the rule by which the material is handled .Consolidation is usually understood to be the systematization of legislation and omission of associated regulations that have been repealed, into a single enlarged document; it is carried out by an authorized law-making body . Acts are included in the structure of the consolidated Act as individual chapters, articles or items . Using this definition, some scholars believe that the relevant regulations are","PeriodicalId":158859,"journal":{"name":"Law and modern states","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and modern states","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14420/EN.2013.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The article is focused on the problem of describing the characteris-tics of such forms of the systematic arrangement of legislation as consolidation . The authors observe different points of jurisprudence concerning the problem of categorizing the types of systematic arrangement of laws and regulations, emphasizing the place of consolidation in these studies . The article presents not only the views of modern scholars, but also gives a brief review of pre-revo-lutionary Russian and Soviet literature on the issue . The authors also provide examples of using consolidation in the legal systems of civil law and common law countries .Keywords: consolidation, systematization of legislation, consolidation bills, codification, codes . I n legal theory there are typically three forms (methods) of the systematization of legislation 1 . These are incorporation, consoli-dation and codification . Some sources name record of regula-tions as a fourth form, and the creation of codes of law as a fifth . In this classification, the description of the types is made according to the level of complexity (depth) of the rule by which the material is handled .Consolidation is usually understood to be the systematization of legislation and omission of associated regulations that have been repealed, into a single enlarged document; it is carried out by an authorized law-making body . Acts are included in the structure of the consolidated Act as individual chapters, articles or items . Using this definition, some scholars believe that the relevant regulations are
论合并作为一种制度安排的立法形式
摘要:本文主要研究的是如何描述合并等立法制度安排形式的特征问题。对法律法规系统安排类型的分类问题,笔者观察了法理学的不同观点,强调了整合在这些研究中的地位。本文不仅介绍了现代学者的观点,还简要回顾了革命前俄国和苏联关于这一问题的文献。作者还列举了大陆法系和英美法系运用合并的实例。关键词:合并,立法系统化,合并法案,法典化,法典。在法学理论中,立法的系统化有三种典型的形式(方法)。它们是合并、合并和编纂。一些来源将法规的记录称为第四种形式,将法典的创建称为第五种形式。在这种分类中,对类型的描述是根据处理材料的规则的复杂程度(深度)进行的。合并通常被理解为将立法和已废除的相关法规的遗漏系统化,纳入一个扩大的文件;它由授权的立法机构执行。法案作为单独的章节、条款或项目包括在合并法案的结构中。利用这一定义,一些学者认为相关规定是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信