Greco-Roman Antiquity in The Library for Reading journal of 1834-1840

E. Smirnova
{"title":"Greco-Roman Antiquity in The Library for Reading journal of 1834-1840","authors":"E. Smirnova","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-1161-1195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to identify the characteristics of classical antiquity representation in The Library for Reading journal in the 1830s, when it was the most popular Russian periodical, with its editor Josef Senkovsky being one of the famous writers and eminent scholars. The study draws on 8 literary publications and 24 research papers related to Greco-Roman antiquity. The analysis of literary works accepted for publication by Senkovsky shows that they were to lead the reader to reflect on three subjects: the features of intellectual pastime in classical antiquity and modernity; the transient nature of power of both an ambitious individual and the great empire; and the similarities, differences, and accomplishments of antiquity and modern times. The works of belles-lettres reflected the ambiguous perception of classical antiquity in the 1830s: on the one hand, viewing its heritage as a “golden standard”, and on the other – picturing it as a bygone and distant epoch through the motifs of catastrophe and decrepitude. The analyzed research publications on antiquity are distinguished by a striking variety of topics and the editor’ desire to make the papers clear and fascinating for readers by presenting classical antiquity not as a boring collection of dead forms, but as full of life and struggle. Moreover, the research articles shaped the image of the classical studies as a dynamic and developing scholarly discipline filled with discoveries, acute disputes, and unsolved riddles. All scholarly publications on Greco-Roman antiquity wrapped thoughtful and profound reflections targeting the highly educated reading elite in a popular narrative addressed to the general audience. The key questions they raised were the significance of classical texts as reliable sources for studying ancient history and understanding ancient Greek and Roman worldviews, as well as the relationships between antiquity and the Ancient East or antiquity and modernity.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-1161-1195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article attempts to identify the characteristics of classical antiquity representation in The Library for Reading journal in the 1830s, when it was the most popular Russian periodical, with its editor Josef Senkovsky being one of the famous writers and eminent scholars. The study draws on 8 literary publications and 24 research papers related to Greco-Roman antiquity. The analysis of literary works accepted for publication by Senkovsky shows that they were to lead the reader to reflect on three subjects: the features of intellectual pastime in classical antiquity and modernity; the transient nature of power of both an ambitious individual and the great empire; and the similarities, differences, and accomplishments of antiquity and modern times. The works of belles-lettres reflected the ambiguous perception of classical antiquity in the 1830s: on the one hand, viewing its heritage as a “golden standard”, and on the other – picturing it as a bygone and distant epoch through the motifs of catastrophe and decrepitude. The analyzed research publications on antiquity are distinguished by a striking variety of topics and the editor’ desire to make the papers clear and fascinating for readers by presenting classical antiquity not as a boring collection of dead forms, but as full of life and struggle. Moreover, the research articles shaped the image of the classical studies as a dynamic and developing scholarly discipline filled with discoveries, acute disputes, and unsolved riddles. All scholarly publications on Greco-Roman antiquity wrapped thoughtful and profound reflections targeting the highly educated reading elite in a popular narrative addressed to the general audience. The key questions they raised were the significance of classical texts as reliable sources for studying ancient history and understanding ancient Greek and Roman worldviews, as well as the relationships between antiquity and the Ancient East or antiquity and modernity.
1834-1840年《图书馆阅读期刊》中的希腊罗马古物
19世纪30年代,《读书图书馆》是俄罗斯最受欢迎的期刊,其编辑约瑟夫·森科夫斯基是著名的作家和杰出的学者。这项研究参考了8篇文学出版物和24篇与希腊罗马古代有关的研究论文。对森科夫斯基接受出版的文学作品的分析表明,它们引导读者对三个主题进行反思:古典古代和现代智力消遣的特征;野心勃勃的个人和伟大帝国的权力都是短暂的;以及古代和现代的异同和成就。美文作品反映了19世纪30年代人们对古典古典的模棱两可的看法:一方面,将其遗产视为“黄金标准”,另一方面,通过灾难和衰老的主题,将其描绘成一个过去和遥远的时代。被分析的古代研究出版物的特点是主题的惊人多样性,编辑希望通过呈现古典古代而不是将其视为无聊的死形式集合,而是充满生命和斗争,使论文清晰而吸引读者。此外,这些研究文章塑造了古典学作为一个充满发现、尖锐争议和未解之谜的动态和发展的学术学科的形象。所有关于希腊罗马古代的学术出版物都将深思熟虑和深刻的反思包裹在一个针对普通受众的流行叙事中,目标是受过高等教育的阅读精英。他们提出的关键问题是古典文本作为研究古代历史和理解古希腊罗马世界观的可靠来源的重要性,以及古代与古代东方或古代与现代之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信