Adaptive Seriational Risk Parity and Other Extensions for Heuristic Portfolio Construction Using Machine Learning and Graph Theory

Peter Schwendner, Jochen Papenbrock, Markus Jaeger, Stephan Krügel
{"title":"Adaptive Seriational Risk Parity and Other Extensions for Heuristic Portfolio Construction Using Machine Learning and Graph Theory","authors":"Peter Schwendner, Jochen Papenbrock, Markus Jaeger, Stephan Krügel","doi":"10.3905/jfds.2021.1.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the authors present a conceptual framework named adaptive seriational risk parity (ASRP) to extend hierarchical risk parity (HRP) as an asset allocation heuristic. The first step of HRP (quasi-diagonalization), determining the hierarchy of assets, is required for the actual allocation done in the second step (recursive bisectioning). In the original HRP scheme, this hierarchy is found using single-linkage hierarchical clustering of the correlation matrix, which is a static tree-based method. The authors compare the performance of the standard HRP with other static and adaptive tree-based methods, as well as seriation-based methods that do not rely on trees. Seriation is a broader concept allowing reordering of the rows or columns of a matrix to best express similarities between the elements. Each discussed variation leads to a different time series reflecting portfolio performance using a 20-year backtest of a multi-asset futures universe. Unsupervised learningbased on these time-series creates a taxonomy that groups the strategies in high correspondence to the construction hierarchy of the various types of ASRP. Performance analysis of the variations shows that most of the static tree-based alternatives to HRP outperform the single-linkage clustering used in HRP on a risk-adjusted basis. Adaptive tree methods show mixed results, and most generic seriation-based approaches underperform. Key Findings ▪ The authors introduce the adaptive seriational risk parity (ASRP) framework as a hierarchy of decisions to implement the quasi-diagonalization step of hierarchical risk parity (HRP) with seriation-based and tree-based variations as alternatives to single linkage. Tree-based variations are further separated in static and adaptive versions. Altogether, 57 variations are discussed and connected to the literature. ▪ Backtests of the 57 different HRP-type asset allocation variations applied to a multi-asset futures universe lead to a correlation matrix of the resulting 57 portfolio return time series. This portfolio return correlation matrix can be visualized as a dendrogram using single-linkage clustering. The correlation hierarchy reflected by the dendrogram is similar to the construction hierarchy of the quasi-diagonalization step. Most seriation-based strategies seem to underperform HRP on a risk-adjusted basis. Most static tree-based variations outperform HRP, whereas adaptive tree-based methods show mixed results. ▪ The presented variations fit into a triple artificial intelligence approach to connect synthetic data generation with explainable machine learning. This approach generates synthetic market data in the first step. The second step applies an HRP-type portfolio allocation approach as discussed in this article. The third step uses a model-agnostic explanation such as the SHAP framework to explain the resulting performance with features of the synthetic market data and with model selection in the second step.","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"77 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2021.1.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, the authors present a conceptual framework named adaptive seriational risk parity (ASRP) to extend hierarchical risk parity (HRP) as an asset allocation heuristic. The first step of HRP (quasi-diagonalization), determining the hierarchy of assets, is required for the actual allocation done in the second step (recursive bisectioning). In the original HRP scheme, this hierarchy is found using single-linkage hierarchical clustering of the correlation matrix, which is a static tree-based method. The authors compare the performance of the standard HRP with other static and adaptive tree-based methods, as well as seriation-based methods that do not rely on trees. Seriation is a broader concept allowing reordering of the rows or columns of a matrix to best express similarities between the elements. Each discussed variation leads to a different time series reflecting portfolio performance using a 20-year backtest of a multi-asset futures universe. Unsupervised learningbased on these time-series creates a taxonomy that groups the strategies in high correspondence to the construction hierarchy of the various types of ASRP. Performance analysis of the variations shows that most of the static tree-based alternatives to HRP outperform the single-linkage clustering used in HRP on a risk-adjusted basis. Adaptive tree methods show mixed results, and most generic seriation-based approaches underperform. Key Findings ▪ The authors introduce the adaptive seriational risk parity (ASRP) framework as a hierarchy of decisions to implement the quasi-diagonalization step of hierarchical risk parity (HRP) with seriation-based and tree-based variations as alternatives to single linkage. Tree-based variations are further separated in static and adaptive versions. Altogether, 57 variations are discussed and connected to the literature. ▪ Backtests of the 57 different HRP-type asset allocation variations applied to a multi-asset futures universe lead to a correlation matrix of the resulting 57 portfolio return time series. This portfolio return correlation matrix can be visualized as a dendrogram using single-linkage clustering. The correlation hierarchy reflected by the dendrogram is similar to the construction hierarchy of the quasi-diagonalization step. Most seriation-based strategies seem to underperform HRP on a risk-adjusted basis. Most static tree-based variations outperform HRP, whereas adaptive tree-based methods show mixed results. ▪ The presented variations fit into a triple artificial intelligence approach to connect synthetic data generation with explainable machine learning. This approach generates synthetic market data in the first step. The second step applies an HRP-type portfolio allocation approach as discussed in this article. The third step uses a model-agnostic explanation such as the SHAP framework to explain the resulting performance with features of the synthetic market data and with model selection in the second step.
基于机器学习和图论的启发式投资组合构建的自适应序列风险奇偶及其他扩展
在本文中,作者提出了一个名为自适应序列风险奇偶(ASRP)的概念框架,以扩展分层风险奇偶(HRP)作为资产配置启发式方法。HRP(准对角化)的第一步,确定资产的层次结构,是在第二步(递归对分)中进行实际分配所必需的。在原来的HRP方案中,该层次结构是通过对相关矩阵进行单链接分层聚类得到的,这是一种基于静态树的方法。这组作者将标准HRP的性能与其他静态的、自适应的基于树的方法以及不依赖于树的基于序列的方法进行了比较。序列化是一个更广泛的概念,允许对矩阵的行或列进行重新排序,以最好地表达元素之间的相似性。每个讨论的变化导致不同的时间序列反映投资组合的表现,使用20年的多资产期货宇宙回测。基于这些时间序列的无监督学习创建了一种分类法,该分类法将策略分组为与各种类型的ASRP的构建层次结构高度对应的策略。对这些变化的性能分析表明,在风险调整的基础上,大多数基于静态树的HRP替代方案的性能优于HRP中使用的单链接聚类。自适应树方法的结果好坏参半,大多数通用的基于序列化的方法表现不佳。▪作者介绍了自适应序列风险奇偶(ASRP)框架作为决策的层次结构,以实现基于序列和基于树的变化作为单一链接的替代的分层风险奇偶(HRP)的准对角化步骤。基于树的变体进一步分为静态和自适应版本。总共讨论了57种变奏,并与文献联系起来。▪对57种不同的hrp型资产配置变量进行回测,得到57种投资组合回报时间序列的相关矩阵。这个投资组合收益相关矩阵可以用单链接聚类可视化为树形图。树状图反映的相关层次与拟对角化步骤的构造层次相似。在风险调整的基础上,大多数基于序列的战略似乎表现不如HRP。大多数基于静态树的变化优于HRP,而基于自适应树的方法显示出混合的结果。▪提出的变化符合三重人工智能方法,将合成数据生成与可解释的机器学习联系起来。这种方法在第一步生成合成的市场数据。第二步应用本文中讨论的hrp类型的投资组合分配方法。第三步使用模型不可知的解释(如SHAP框架)来解释合成市场数据的特征和第二步中的模型选择的结果性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信