Excessive Control of Teleworkers’ Activity as a Factor of Labor Relations Pollution

M. Chudinovskikh, A. Fedorova, Natalia Tonkikh
{"title":"Excessive Control of Teleworkers’ Activity as a Factor of Labor Relations Pollution","authors":"M. Chudinovskikh, A. Fedorova, Natalia Tonkikh","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210322.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the spread of COVID-19, many organizations are forced to switch employees to telework. One of the most important issues in the organization of telework is the control over the activities, results ant outputs. This study evaluates the methods of monitoring teleworker activities, including electronic monitoring and surveillance (EMS). Control methods are divided into «hard» and «soft» groups. Based on the analysis of the practice of the European court of human rights, it is concluded that secret surveillance, control of correspondence refers to excessive control and is a factor of social pollution of labor relations. The paper gives recommendations for the organization of telework control based on a balance of private and public interests. The degree of control must correspond to the protection of the legal rights and interests of the employer. The author suggests that methods of «hard control» with the development of organizational culture should be gradually replaced with «soft» ones, focusing on the KPI, peer and self-control system.","PeriodicalId":169293,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference 'Current problems of social and labour relations' (ISPC-CPSLR 2020)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the VIII International Scientific and Practical Conference 'Current problems of social and labour relations' (ISPC-CPSLR 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210322.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the spread of COVID-19, many organizations are forced to switch employees to telework. One of the most important issues in the organization of telework is the control over the activities, results ant outputs. This study evaluates the methods of monitoring teleworker activities, including electronic monitoring and surveillance (EMS). Control methods are divided into «hard» and «soft» groups. Based on the analysis of the practice of the European court of human rights, it is concluded that secret surveillance, control of correspondence refers to excessive control and is a factor of social pollution of labor relations. The paper gives recommendations for the organization of telework control based on a balance of private and public interests. The degree of control must correspond to the protection of the legal rights and interests of the employer. The author suggests that methods of «hard control» with the development of organizational culture should be gradually replaced with «soft» ones, focusing on the KPI, peer and self-control system.
远程工作者活动的过度控制是劳动关系污染的一个因素
随着COVID-19的传播,许多组织被迫将员工转换为远程办公。远程办公组织中最重要的问题之一是对活动、结果和输出的控制。本研究评估了监控远程工作者活动的方法,包括电子监控和监视(EMS)。控制方法分为“硬”组和“软”组。通过对欧洲人权法院实践的分析,认为秘密监视、通信控制是指过度控制,是劳动关系社会污染的一个因素。本文提出了基于个人和公共利益平衡的远程办公控制组织建议。控制的程度必须与对雇主合法权益的保护相适应。作者建议,随着组织文化的发展,“硬控制”的方法应该逐渐被“软控制”所取代,重点是KPI、同伴和自我控制系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信