Revisiting the Reed-Muller Locally Correctable Codes

Feng Cheng
{"title":"Revisiting the Reed-Muller Locally Correctable Codes","authors":"Feng Cheng","doi":"10.1109/IAEAC47372.2019.8997905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Local codes are a special kind of error-correcting codes. Locally correctable codes (LCCs) are one type of local codes. LCCs can efficiently recover any coordinate of its corrupted encoding by probing only a few but not all fraction of the corrupted word. A q-ary LCC which encodes length k messages to length N codewords with relative distance Δ has three parameters: r, δ and ϵ. r is called query complexity recording the number of queries. δ is called tolerance fraction measuring the relative distance between encoding codewords and its corrupted codes which can be locally decoded. ϵ is called error probability showing the coordinate of its corrupted encoding fail to be recovered with probability at most ϵ. One fundamental problem in LCCs is to determine the trade-off among rate, distance and query complexity. But for a specific LCC, focus is on query complexity, tolerance fraction and error probability. Reed-Muller codes (RM codes) are the most presentative LCCs. In order to understand the \"local\" more clearly, we revisit local correctors for RM codes and analyze them in detail: 1)The decoding procedures; 2)The role of Reed-Solomon codes (RS codes) in decoding RM LCCs; 3)Other local correctors for RM codes. How parameters including r, δ and ϵ change in RM LCCs have been analyzed in different correctors. We believe this paper can help us understand local codes better and grasp the main soul of this research direction.","PeriodicalId":164163,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAEAC47372.2019.8997905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local codes are a special kind of error-correcting codes. Locally correctable codes (LCCs) are one type of local codes. LCCs can efficiently recover any coordinate of its corrupted encoding by probing only a few but not all fraction of the corrupted word. A q-ary LCC which encodes length k messages to length N codewords with relative distance Δ has three parameters: r, δ and ϵ. r is called query complexity recording the number of queries. δ is called tolerance fraction measuring the relative distance between encoding codewords and its corrupted codes which can be locally decoded. ϵ is called error probability showing the coordinate of its corrupted encoding fail to be recovered with probability at most ϵ. One fundamental problem in LCCs is to determine the trade-off among rate, distance and query complexity. But for a specific LCC, focus is on query complexity, tolerance fraction and error probability. Reed-Muller codes (RM codes) are the most presentative LCCs. In order to understand the "local" more clearly, we revisit local correctors for RM codes and analyze them in detail: 1)The decoding procedures; 2)The role of Reed-Solomon codes (RS codes) in decoding RM LCCs; 3)Other local correctors for RM codes. How parameters including r, δ and ϵ change in RM LCCs have been analyzed in different correctors. We believe this paper can help us understand local codes better and grasp the main soul of this research direction.
重新审视Reed-Muller局部可校正码
局域码是一种特殊的纠错码。局部可校正码(lcc)是一种局部码。lcc可以通过探测损坏字的一小部分而不是全部来有效地恢复其损坏编码的任何坐标。一个q元LCC将长度为k的消息编码为长度为N的码字,相对距离为Δ,它有三个参数:r, Δ和λ。R称为查询复杂度,记录查询的数量。δ称为容差分数,表示编码码字与其可局部译码的损坏码之间的相对距离。λ被称为错误概率,表示其被破坏的编码坐标无法以最多λ的概率恢复。lcc的一个基本问题是确定速率、距离和查询复杂性之间的权衡。但对于特定的LCC,重点是查询复杂度、容差分数和错误概率。Reed-Muller码(RM码)是最具代表性的lcc。为了更清晰地理解“局部”,我们重新审视RM码的局部校正器,并对其进行详细分析:1)译码过程;2) Reed-Solomon码(RS码)在RM lcc解码中的作用;3)其他本地RM代码校正器。在不同的校正器中分析了RM lcc中r、δ和λ等参数的变化。我们相信本文可以帮助我们更好地理解地方代码,把握这一研究方向的主要灵魂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信