Analisis Pendekatan Rules of Reason dalam Kasus Praktik Predatory Pricing (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 03/KPPU-L/2020)

Wajah Hukum Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.33087/wjh.v7i1.1001
Vincent Sutanto
{"title":"Analisis Pendekatan Rules of Reason dalam Kasus Praktik Predatory Pricing (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 03/KPPU-L/2020)","authors":"Vincent Sutanto","doi":"10.33087/wjh.v7i1.1001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of predatory pricing is the act of a business actor to get rid of or hinder a competitor’s business in the relevant market share by selling at a loss or setting a very low price. Conch South Kalimantan Cement Limited Company was reported on suspicion of predatory pricing practice. The allegation report is based on Article 20 of Indonesian Law Number 5 of 1999. In the formulation of the article, the rules of reason approach are used. In the rules of reason approach, even if a business actor is proven to have practiced predatory pricing, it is still possible to be declared innocent. This is because in the rules of reason approach, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha first looks for the predatory pricing that cause anti-competition in market shares or not. As long as it does not cause anti-competition and supports business competition, Conch South Kalimantan Cement Limited Company cannot be sanctioned and found not guilty. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha after using rules of reason approach finally stated Conch South Kalimantan Cement predatory pricing practice cause anti-competition and give it sanction.","PeriodicalId":283705,"journal":{"name":"Wajah Hukum","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wajah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v7i1.1001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of predatory pricing is the act of a business actor to get rid of or hinder a competitor’s business in the relevant market share by selling at a loss or setting a very low price. Conch South Kalimantan Cement Limited Company was reported on suspicion of predatory pricing practice. The allegation report is based on Article 20 of Indonesian Law Number 5 of 1999. In the formulation of the article, the rules of reason approach are used. In the rules of reason approach, even if a business actor is proven to have practiced predatory pricing, it is still possible to be declared innocent. This is because in the rules of reason approach, Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha first looks for the predatory pricing that cause anti-competition in market shares or not. As long as it does not cause anti-competition and supports business competition, Conch South Kalimantan Cement Limited Company cannot be sanctioned and found not guilty. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha after using rules of reason approach finally stated Conch South Kalimantan Cement predatory pricing practice cause anti-competition and give it sanction.
侵入捕食实践中的理性方法分析(案例研究编号03/ kppul /2020)
掠夺性定价的做法是商业行为者通过亏本销售或设定非常低的价格来摆脱或阻碍竞争对手在相关市场份额上的业务的行为。据报道,海螺南加里曼丹水泥有限公司涉嫌掠夺性定价。指控报告所依据的是印度尼西亚1999年第5号法律第20条。在文章的制定中,采用了理性规则的方法。在理性规则方法中,即使商业行为者被证明实施了掠夺性定价,仍有可能被宣布无罪。这是因为在理性规则方法中,Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha首先寻找掠夺性定价是否会导致市场份额的反竞争。只要不造成反竞争,支持商业竞争,海螺南加里曼丹水泥有限公司就不能被制裁,不能被判无罪。Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha在使用理性规则方法后最终表示,海螺南加里曼丹水泥的掠夺性定价行为造成反竞争,并给予制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信