Communication Without Concepts

Jean-Michel Besnier, P. Ridel
{"title":"Communication Without Concepts","authors":"Jean-Michel Besnier, P. Ridel","doi":"10.3406/RESO.1993.3255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: Communication has been taken over by the language of science and cybernetics, which have reduced it to the role of information-processing and put it firmly on the path of integral modelling. The developments in systemic pragmatics and the blossoming of the cognitive sciences appear to confirm the discrediting of the hermeneutical and ethical standpoints to which philosophers had been attached. It is, nevertheless, by reference to Kantianism that intersubjectivity is now imposing an approach to meaning through the efforts of Apel, Habermas and Grice. With the limits of conceptual ambitions exposed, conversation and, more generally, literature seem to promise a non-reductional elucidation of communicational exchanges.","PeriodicalId":213999,"journal":{"name":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1993.3255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Communication has been taken over by the language of science and cybernetics, which have reduced it to the role of information-processing and put it firmly on the path of integral modelling. The developments in systemic pragmatics and the blossoming of the cognitive sciences appear to confirm the discrediting of the hermeneutical and ethical standpoints to which philosophers had been attached. It is, nevertheless, by reference to Kantianism that intersubjectivity is now imposing an approach to meaning through the efforts of Apel, Habermas and Grice. With the limits of conceptual ambitions exposed, conversation and, more generally, literature seem to promise a non-reductional elucidation of communicational exchanges.
没有概念的沟通
摘要:交流已经被科学和控制论的语言所取代,它们将其降低为信息处理的角色,并将其坚定地置于整体建模的道路上。系统语用学的发展和认知科学的蓬勃发展似乎证实了哲学家们所依附的解释学和伦理学立场的可信度。然而,通过引用康德主义,通过阿佩尔、哈贝马斯和格赖斯的努力,主体间性现在正在强加一种对意义的方法。随着概念野心的局限性暴露出来,对话,更普遍地说,文学似乎承诺了对交流的非简化解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信