The influence of clinical use of antibiotics and the sensitivity of strains isolated from postoperative infections--a comparison of nosocomial pathogens with strains isolated from the bacterial flora of patients.

Y Takesue, T Yokoyama, T Kodama, Y Murakami, H Sewake, K Miyamoto, Y Imamura, H Tsumura, Y Matsuura
{"title":"The influence of clinical use of antibiotics and the sensitivity of strains isolated from postoperative infections--a comparison of nosocomial pathogens with strains isolated from the bacterial flora of patients.","authors":"Y Takesue,&nbsp;T Yokoyama,&nbsp;T Kodama,&nbsp;Y Murakami,&nbsp;H Sewake,&nbsp;K Miyamoto,&nbsp;Y Imamura,&nbsp;H Tsumura,&nbsp;Y Matsuura","doi":"10.1007/BF02470964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study, we investigated how the recent clinical use of antibiotics have altered the antibiotic susceptibility of strains isolated from postoperative infections, especially Gram-negative rods. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, serogroup E strains accounted for about 20 per cent of postoperative infections, but were unable to be isolated from either the feces of patients on admission or from the appendix contents of patients with appendicitis. It therefore appeared that serogroup E strains were responsible for the nosocomial infections in our department. The strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa serogroup E, which we assumed to be nosocomial pathogens, acquired a high level of resistance to antibiotics soon after third-generation cephems became widely used. On the other hand, the antibiotic susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, and the serogroups of Pseudomonas aeruginosa other than E, which were considered to originate from the bacterial flora of patients, did not vary throughout the several years of the study period.</p>","PeriodicalId":22610,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of surgery","volume":"21 4","pages":"376-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02470964","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02470964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated how the recent clinical use of antibiotics have altered the antibiotic susceptibility of strains isolated from postoperative infections, especially Gram-negative rods. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, serogroup E strains accounted for about 20 per cent of postoperative infections, but were unable to be isolated from either the feces of patients on admission or from the appendix contents of patients with appendicitis. It therefore appeared that serogroup E strains were responsible for the nosocomial infections in our department. The strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa serogroup E, which we assumed to be nosocomial pathogens, acquired a high level of resistance to antibiotics soon after third-generation cephems became widely used. On the other hand, the antibiotic susceptibility of Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, and the serogroups of Pseudomonas aeruginosa other than E, which were considered to originate from the bacterial flora of patients, did not vary throughout the several years of the study period.

临床使用抗生素的影响和术后感染分离菌株的敏感性——医院病原体与患者细菌菌群分离菌株的比较
在本研究中,我们调查了近期临床使用抗生素如何改变从术后感染分离的菌株的抗生素敏感性,特别是革兰氏阴性棒。对于铜绿假单胞菌,血清E组菌株约占术后感染的20%,但无法从入院患者的粪便或阑尾炎患者的阑尾内容物中分离出来。因此,血清E组菌株是导致我科院内感染的主要原因。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌血清E组菌株,我们认为是院内病原菌,在第三代头孢菌被广泛使用后不久就对抗生素产生了高水平的耐药性。另一方面,阴沟肠杆菌、弗氏柠檬酸杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌血清群的抗生素敏感性在几年的研究期间没有变化,这被认为是来自患者的细菌菌群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信