Does Probability Weighting Drive Skewness Preferences?

Benjamin M. Blau, Jared DeLisle, Ryan J. Whitby
{"title":"Does Probability Weighting Drive Skewness Preferences?","authors":"Benjamin M. Blau, Jared DeLisle, Ryan J. Whitby","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3002742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a test of Barberis and Huang’s (2008) theory of skewness preferences. The probability weighting feature that is the basis of their theory relies on investors overweighting the probability of tail events. The resulting investor preferences for positive skewness in return distributions will lead to excess demand, contemporaneous price premiums, and negative expected returns. We use the well-documented 52-week high bias as a method to truncate the probability of expected right-tail events. We find evidence supporting the Barberis and Huang theory as the negative return premia associated with positive skewness are driven almost entirely by stocks that are farther away from the their 52-week high .","PeriodicalId":430498,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Finance & Banking Conferences","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Finance & Banking Conferences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3002742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We propose a test of Barberis and Huang’s (2008) theory of skewness preferences. The probability weighting feature that is the basis of their theory relies on investors overweighting the probability of tail events. The resulting investor preferences for positive skewness in return distributions will lead to excess demand, contemporaneous price premiums, and negative expected returns. We use the well-documented 52-week high bias as a method to truncate the probability of expected right-tail events. We find evidence supporting the Barberis and Huang theory as the negative return premia associated with positive skewness are driven almost entirely by stocks that are farther away from the their 52-week high .
概率加权驱动偏度偏好吗?
我们提出了Barberis和Huang(2008)偏度偏好理论的检验。作为其理论基础的概率加权特征依赖于投资者高估尾部事件的概率。由此产生的投资者对收益分布正偏性的偏好将导致需求过剩、同期价格溢价和负预期收益。我们使用充分证明的52周高偏倚作为截断预期右尾事件概率的方法。我们发现了支持Barberis和Huang理论的证据,因为与正偏度相关的负回报溢价几乎完全是由远离52周高点的股票驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书