Analyzing large free-response qualitative data sets — a novel quantitative-qualitative hybrid approach

J. Light, K. Yasuhara
{"title":"Analyzing large free-response qualitative data sets — a novel quantitative-qualitative hybrid approach","authors":"J. Light, K. Yasuhara","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2008.4720426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative analysis tends to be unwieldy for large data sets yet is an indispensable tool for understanding how and why phenomena occur. Consequently, the goal of this study was to develop a method that is credible yet economical for large, specific, qualitative data sets. The strength of our hybrid, qualitative-quantitative method comes from using automated text analysis techniques to focus resource-intensive coding efforts on a small, carefully selected subset of data. This paper details the hybrid method as applied to a previously analyzed set of free-response data and argues for the methodpsilas validity by comparing results from the hybrid analysis with the previous traditional qualitatively analyzed method. With this data set, the hybrid method yielded comparable results with substantially less manual coding and in less than a third of the time required for the original analysis method. This hybrid analysis provides a more economical alternative for a ldquocoarse-cutrdquo qualitative analysis and observation of long-term trends, providing insight to practitioners, assessors, and researchers ranging from individual course evaluations to large-scale studies. Short, focused, open-ended survey questions are good candidates for this type of analysis.","PeriodicalId":342595,"journal":{"name":"2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2008.4720426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Qualitative analysis tends to be unwieldy for large data sets yet is an indispensable tool for understanding how and why phenomena occur. Consequently, the goal of this study was to develop a method that is credible yet economical for large, specific, qualitative data sets. The strength of our hybrid, qualitative-quantitative method comes from using automated text analysis techniques to focus resource-intensive coding efforts on a small, carefully selected subset of data. This paper details the hybrid method as applied to a previously analyzed set of free-response data and argues for the methodpsilas validity by comparing results from the hybrid analysis with the previous traditional qualitatively analyzed method. With this data set, the hybrid method yielded comparable results with substantially less manual coding and in less than a third of the time required for the original analysis method. This hybrid analysis provides a more economical alternative for a ldquocoarse-cutrdquo qualitative analysis and observation of long-term trends, providing insight to practitioners, assessors, and researchers ranging from individual course evaluations to large-scale studies. Short, focused, open-ended survey questions are good candidates for this type of analysis.
分析大型自由响应定性数据集-一种新的定量-定性混合方法
定性分析往往是笨拙的大数据集,但它是一个不可缺少的工具,了解如何和为什么现象发生。因此,本研究的目标是开发一种可靠而经济的方法,用于大型,具体,定性数据集。我们的混合定性定量方法的优势来自于使用自动文本分析技术,将资源密集型编码工作集中在一个小的、精心选择的数据子集上。本文详细介绍了混合分析方法在一组自由响应数据分析中的应用,并将混合分析结果与传统的定性分析方法进行了比较,论证了混合分析方法的有效性。有了这个数据集,混合方法产生了相当的结果,手工编码大大减少,所需时间不到原始分析方法的三分之一。这种混合分析提供了一种更经济的替代方法,可以进行一般的定性分析和长期趋势的观察,为从业人员、评估人员和研究人员提供从个别课程评估到大规模研究的见解。简短、集中、开放式的调查问题是这种分析的好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信