ePortfolios for self-regulated learning

C. Deneen, Tracii Ryan, M. Prosser
{"title":"ePortfolios for self-regulated learning","authors":"C. Deneen, Tracii Ryan, M. Prosser","doi":"10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ePortfolios in higher education are assumed to be effective at developing and determining complex student competencies and skills highly correspondent to self-regulated learning (SRL). Research validating this assumption, however, is sparse and of varying quality. Drawing on a recent, systematic review of relevant literature by the presenter’s research team, this Pecha Kucha explores major trends and gaps in the research into relationships between ePortfolios and SRL. Corresponding areas and approaches for further research are identified, as well. \nSustained academic success requires autonomy, agency, and motivation from the learner to effectively plan and execute learning activities (Henri, Morrell & Scott, 2017; Pintrich, 2004). Due to the correspondence of SRL to these characteristics, higher education practitioners and researchers are increasingly interested in how best to support and determine students' SRL development. \nePortfolios are believed to be a means for accomplishing and evidencing this development. ePortfolios are deliberate, curated collections of work that may provide opportunity for development and demonstration of complex outcomes (Stefani, Mason & Pegler, 2007). This value proposition is based on perceptions that ePortfolios are guided by frameworks for learning rather than predetermined product; centre on active learner engagement and authority; and foster connection and synthesis within and across curricula (Watson, Kuh, Rhodes, Light & Chen, 2016). These criteria strongly overlap with elements of SRL and align with best practices in assessment. ePortfolios are also perceived as a way in which educational technologies may be leveraged to allow students to develop and evidence competencies in innovative ways (Author, 2014). \nThe literature supporting such conclusions, however, has recognised problems. These problems range from methodological limitations to a lack of specificity about which activities comprising ePortfolio engagement are most relevant to SRL competencies (Author, 2013; Author, 2018; Rhodes, Chen, Watson, & Garrison, 2014). \nThis Pecha Kucha presents results from a systematic review of relevant literature on ePortfolios and SRL. The objectives of the review were to identify methodologically sound studies examining ePortfolio use in relation to SRL, systematically review whether, and how ePortfolio use improves or allows evidence of students’ SRL skills, and propose useful directions for future research and practice. \nA systematic, multi-stage review was conducted of relevant, empirical literature. This yielded only eight studies of sufficient quality and relevance to inform understandings of ePortfolios’ interactions with SRL. Results support the general premise that ePortfolios correlate to SRL development in a higher education context. Limitations within the literature, however, inhibit our ability to establish more specific or causal connections. \nA subsequent thematic analysis of the broader scope of near-acceptable literature yielded a schema of specific, SRL-relevant ePortfolio learning tasks and activities. These have potential for informing practice but require further robust and contextually relevant research. The Pecha Kucha concludes by offering specific suggestions for conducting this research.","PeriodicalId":384031,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v4i1.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ePortfolios in higher education are assumed to be effective at developing and determining complex student competencies and skills highly correspondent to self-regulated learning (SRL). Research validating this assumption, however, is sparse and of varying quality. Drawing on a recent, systematic review of relevant literature by the presenter’s research team, this Pecha Kucha explores major trends and gaps in the research into relationships between ePortfolios and SRL. Corresponding areas and approaches for further research are identified, as well. Sustained academic success requires autonomy, agency, and motivation from the learner to effectively plan and execute learning activities (Henri, Morrell & Scott, 2017; Pintrich, 2004). Due to the correspondence of SRL to these characteristics, higher education practitioners and researchers are increasingly interested in how best to support and determine students' SRL development. ePortfolios are believed to be a means for accomplishing and evidencing this development. ePortfolios are deliberate, curated collections of work that may provide opportunity for development and demonstration of complex outcomes (Stefani, Mason & Pegler, 2007). This value proposition is based on perceptions that ePortfolios are guided by frameworks for learning rather than predetermined product; centre on active learner engagement and authority; and foster connection and synthesis within and across curricula (Watson, Kuh, Rhodes, Light & Chen, 2016). These criteria strongly overlap with elements of SRL and align with best practices in assessment. ePortfolios are also perceived as a way in which educational technologies may be leveraged to allow students to develop and evidence competencies in innovative ways (Author, 2014). The literature supporting such conclusions, however, has recognised problems. These problems range from methodological limitations to a lack of specificity about which activities comprising ePortfolio engagement are most relevant to SRL competencies (Author, 2013; Author, 2018; Rhodes, Chen, Watson, & Garrison, 2014). This Pecha Kucha presents results from a systematic review of relevant literature on ePortfolios and SRL. The objectives of the review were to identify methodologically sound studies examining ePortfolio use in relation to SRL, systematically review whether, and how ePortfolio use improves or allows evidence of students’ SRL skills, and propose useful directions for future research and practice. A systematic, multi-stage review was conducted of relevant, empirical literature. This yielded only eight studies of sufficient quality and relevance to inform understandings of ePortfolios’ interactions with SRL. Results support the general premise that ePortfolios correlate to SRL development in a higher education context. Limitations within the literature, however, inhibit our ability to establish more specific or causal connections. A subsequent thematic analysis of the broader scope of near-acceptable literature yielded a schema of specific, SRL-relevant ePortfolio learning tasks and activities. These have potential for informing practice but require further robust and contextually relevant research. The Pecha Kucha concludes by offering specific suggestions for conducting this research.
用于自我调节学习的电子作品集
高等教育中的电子作品集被认为在开发和确定复杂的学生能力和技能方面是有效的,这些能力和技能高度符合自我调节学习(SRL)。然而,证实这一假设的研究很少,而且质量参差不齐。根据最近由主持人的研究团队对相关文献的系统回顾,本Pecha Kucha探讨了电子投资组合和SRL之间关系研究的主要趋势和差距。确定了进一步研究的相应领域和方法。持续的学业成功需要学习者的自主性、能动性和动机来有效地计划和执行学习活动(Henri, Morrell & Scott, 2017;Pintrich, 2004)。由于SRL符合这些特征,高等教育从业者和研究人员越来越关注如何最好地支持和确定学生的SRL发展。电子投资组合被认为是实现和证明这一发展的一种手段。电子作品集是经过深思熟虑、精心策划的作品集合,可以为复杂成果的开发和演示提供机会(Stefani, Mason & Pegler, 2007)。这一价值主张是基于以下观念:电子投资组合是由学习框架而不是预先确定的产品来指导的;注重学习者的主动参与和权威;并促进课程内部和跨课程的联系和综合(Watson, Kuh, Rhodes, Light & Chen, 2016)。这些标准与SRL的元素高度重叠,并与评估中的最佳实践保持一致。电子作品集也被认为是利用教育技术让学生以创新的方式发展和证明能力的一种方式(Author, 2014)。然而,支持这一结论的文献已经认识到了问题。这些问题包括方法上的限制,以及缺乏关于哪些组成电子投资组合的活动与SRL能力最相关的特异性(Author, 2013;作者,2018;Rhodes, Chen, Watson, & Garrison, 2014)。本文介绍了对电子投资组合和SRL相关文献的系统综述结果。本综述的目的是确定方法上合理的研究,检查电子档案档案的使用与SRL的关系,系统地审查电子档案档案的使用是否以及如何提高或允许学生的SRL技能的证据,并为未来的研究和实践提出有用的方向。对相关的实证文献进行了系统的、多阶段的回顾。这只产生了8项具有足够质量和相关性的研究,以了解ePortfolios与SRL的相互作用。结果支持了电子投资组合与高等教育背景下SRL发展相关的一般前提。然而,文献的局限性限制了我们建立更具体或因果关系的能力。随后对更广泛范围内近乎可接受的文献进行专题分析,得出了一个具体的、与srl相关的电子投资学习任务和活动的图式。这些有可能为实践提供信息,但需要进一步进行强有力的和与背景相关的研究。《Pecha Kucha》最后提出了进行这项研究的具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信