Effects of Soil Depths on Nymphal Eclosion of Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius)

A. Pantoja, R. Ranft, D. Fielding, A. Hagerty, Susan Y. Emmert
{"title":"Effects of Soil Depths on Nymphal Eclosion of Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius)","authors":"A. Pantoja, R. Ranft, D. Fielding, A. Hagerty, Susan Y. Emmert","doi":"10.2174/1874407901206010049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work reports on the use of cultural practices that influence grasshoppers' nymphal emergence. Grasshop- per eggs were buried at depths of 2, 14, 18, 22, and 26 cm in laboratory arenas. Nymph eclosion ranged from 77.5 to 87.8%. However, nymph emergence, measured as the number of nymphs that reached the soil surface, was estimated at 70.9% when eggs were buried at 2cm, but was reduced to 2.5 % at 18cm depth. No nymphs emerged at depths of 22 cm or more. The relative high percentage of nymphal eclosion and the low or no nymph emergence suggests that the depths tested on this trial do not affect egg development and nymphal eclosion, but affect the ability of the insect to emerge to the soil surface, thus increasing first instar mortality. The addition of sand to the soil reduced nymphal emergence. A signifi- cantly lower percentage of hoppers emerged from sand as compared to soil, vermiculite, or soil mixed with 25, 50 and 75% sand. This suggests that cultural practices, such as plowing can be used as a management tool to control grasshop- pers. Further research should investigate if nymphs died of suffocation at the eclosion site or in the process of emerging to the soil surface.","PeriodicalId":143634,"journal":{"name":"The Open Entomology Journal","volume":"16 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Entomology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874407901206010049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work reports on the use of cultural practices that influence grasshoppers' nymphal emergence. Grasshop- per eggs were buried at depths of 2, 14, 18, 22, and 26 cm in laboratory arenas. Nymph eclosion ranged from 77.5 to 87.8%. However, nymph emergence, measured as the number of nymphs that reached the soil surface, was estimated at 70.9% when eggs were buried at 2cm, but was reduced to 2.5 % at 18cm depth. No nymphs emerged at depths of 22 cm or more. The relative high percentage of nymphal eclosion and the low or no nymph emergence suggests that the depths tested on this trial do not affect egg development and nymphal eclosion, but affect the ability of the insect to emerge to the soil surface, thus increasing first instar mortality. The addition of sand to the soil reduced nymphal emergence. A signifi- cantly lower percentage of hoppers emerged from sand as compared to soil, vermiculite, or soil mixed with 25, 50 and 75% sand. This suggests that cultural practices, such as plowing can be used as a management tool to control grasshop- pers. Further research should investigate if nymphs died of suffocation at the eclosion site or in the process of emerging to the soil surface.
土壤深度对多色黑莓(Melanoplus sanguinipes)若虫羽化的影响
这项工作报告了影响蚱蜢若虫出现的文化习俗的使用。在试验场中,每个虫卵分别埋于2、14、18、22和26 cm的深度。若虫羽化率为77.5% ~ 87.8%。然而,若虫出苗率,以到达土壤表面的若虫数量来衡量,当卵埋在2cm深度时估计为70.9%,但在18cm深度时下降到2.5%。在22厘米或更深处没有若虫出现。若虫羽化率相对较高,若虫羽化率较低或不羽化,说明本试验所测深度不影响虫卵发育和若虫羽化,但影响了昆虫羽化到土壤表面的能力,从而增加了一龄虫死亡率。向土壤中添加沙子减少了若虫的出苗率。与土壤、蛭石或混合了25%、50%和75%沙子的土壤相比,沙子中出现的跳虫比例明显较低。这表明,文化实践,如耕作,可以作为一种管理工具来控制蚱蜢。进一步的研究应该调查若虫是在羽化地点死于窒息,还是在浮出土壤表面的过程中死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信