A participatory discourse analysis of service users’ accounts of meeting places in Norwegian community mental health care

Lill Susann Ynnesdal Haugen, Andreas Envy, T. Ekeland, M. Borg, N. Anderssen
{"title":"A participatory discourse analysis of service users’ accounts of meeting places in Norwegian community mental health care","authors":"Lill Susann Ynnesdal Haugen, Andreas Envy, T. Ekeland, M. Borg, N. Anderssen","doi":"10.7577/NJSR.2149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1960s, deinstitutionalisation has been salient in mental health reforms across the West. In Norway, this culminated in the National Action Plan for Mental Health (1999-2008), where meeting places in community mental health care were deemed a prioritised strategy to counter social isolation among people in psychosocial hardships. However, during the same period in England, meeting places were beginning to be contested for contributing to social exclusion. This is an inquiry of meeting places in Norway guided by the following research question: How do service users discuss their encounters with the spaces and people of meeting places? Situated in community psychology and participatory research traditions, we engaged in a participatory discourse analysis of four focus group discussions with 22 service users from meeting places. We detail and discuss four central discursive constructions of meeting places against the backdrop of a civil society identified as fraught with sanism that stigmatises and excludes service users: a compensatory public welfare arrangement positioning service users as citizens with social rights; a peer community positioning service users as peers who share common identities and interests; spaces of compassion validating service users as fellow human beings who are precious in their own right; and greenhouses facilitating service users to expand their horizons of possibility. This inquiry implies that meeting places could mean everything to the people who attend them by facilitating opportunities considered less accessible elsewhere in their everyday lives in a sanist civil society.","PeriodicalId":207067,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/NJSR.2149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the 1960s, deinstitutionalisation has been salient in mental health reforms across the West. In Norway, this culminated in the National Action Plan for Mental Health (1999-2008), where meeting places in community mental health care were deemed a prioritised strategy to counter social isolation among people in psychosocial hardships. However, during the same period in England, meeting places were beginning to be contested for contributing to social exclusion. This is an inquiry of meeting places in Norway guided by the following research question: How do service users discuss their encounters with the spaces and people of meeting places? Situated in community psychology and participatory research traditions, we engaged in a participatory discourse analysis of four focus group discussions with 22 service users from meeting places. We detail and discuss four central discursive constructions of meeting places against the backdrop of a civil society identified as fraught with sanism that stigmatises and excludes service users: a compensatory public welfare arrangement positioning service users as citizens with social rights; a peer community positioning service users as peers who share common identities and interests; spaces of compassion validating service users as fellow human beings who are precious in their own right; and greenhouses facilitating service users to expand their horizons of possibility. This inquiry implies that meeting places could mean everything to the people who attend them by facilitating opportunities considered less accessible elsewhere in their everyday lives in a sanist civil society.
挪威社区精神卫生保健服务使用者关于会面地点的参与性话语分析
自20世纪60年代以来,去机构化一直是整个西方精神卫生改革的重要内容。在挪威,这在《国家精神卫生行动计划》(1999-2008年)中达到高潮,其中社区精神卫生保健场所被视为消除社会心理困难人群的社会孤立的优先战略。然而,在同一时期的英国,聚会场所开始因助长社会排斥而受到争议。这是一项关于挪威会议场所的调查,其研究问题如下:服务使用者如何讨论他们与会议场所的空间和人的相遇?基于社区心理学和参与性研究传统,我们对来自会议场所的22名服务用户进行了四次焦点小组讨论,并进行了参与性话语分析。我们详细讨论了在一个被认定为充满歧视和排斥服务使用者的sanism的公民社会背景下,会议场所的四种中心话语结构:一种补偿性的公共福利安排,将服务使用者定位为拥有社会权利的公民;将服务用户定位为具有共同身份和兴趣的同伴;同情空间,将服务使用者视为人类同胞,他们自己的权利是宝贵的;而温室为服务用户拓展可能性的视野提供便利。这项调查表明,对于参加会议的人来说,会议场所可能意味着一切,因为它为他们在一个人道主义公民社会的日常生活中提供了在其他地方难以获得的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信