Evaluation of Implant Survival by Analysing Dental Panoramic Radiographs: 10-Year Retrospective Study

K. Aydin, Selin Gaş
{"title":"Evaluation of Implant Survival by Analysing Dental Panoramic Radiographs: 10-Year Retrospective Study","authors":"K. Aydin, Selin Gaş","doi":"10.2478/bjdm-2020-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Background/Aim: Panoramic radiographs have been used widely for pre-implant evaluation and the preparation of treatment protocols. Panoramic radiography is often the first choice method for the implant placements because it gives information on the overall shape of the jaws, the position of the maxillary sinus floor and the nasal cavity floor, and vertical position of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen in relation to dental implants. The specific aim of the present study was to evaluate 10-year survival rate of dental implants by analysis of dental panoramic radiographs. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 507 panoramic radiographs of 156 implant patients. Initial oral health status, proceedings of Restorative/Endodontic treatments before implant placement, missing number of teeth and edentulism types, finalization of implant related prosthetic treatments during controls, implant quality scorings at baseline/ controls and implant fails were analyzed. Results: The study results reveal statistically significant difference between the performed R/E treatment rates, according to the need for R/E treatments (p= 0.008). During the initial radiograph 96.1% of the implants were successful and 3.9% had satisfactory survival. At last control 86% of the implants were successful, 10.3% had satisfactory survival, 1% had impairment in survival and 2.8% were unsuccessful. The change in the last control compared to the initial radiograph is statistically significant (p= 0.000) regarding satisfactory survival. Conclusions: Long-term implant survival is not significantly affected by gender, age, type of edentulism, the presence of periodontal disease, R/E treatment needs, implant location, prosthesis type, and the presence of multiple implants.","PeriodicalId":161469,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bjdm-2020-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Background/Aim: Panoramic radiographs have been used widely for pre-implant evaluation and the preparation of treatment protocols. Panoramic radiography is often the first choice method for the implant placements because it gives information on the overall shape of the jaws, the position of the maxillary sinus floor and the nasal cavity floor, and vertical position of the mandibular canal and the mental foramen in relation to dental implants. The specific aim of the present study was to evaluate 10-year survival rate of dental implants by analysis of dental panoramic radiographs. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 507 panoramic radiographs of 156 implant patients. Initial oral health status, proceedings of Restorative/Endodontic treatments before implant placement, missing number of teeth and edentulism types, finalization of implant related prosthetic treatments during controls, implant quality scorings at baseline/ controls and implant fails were analyzed. Results: The study results reveal statistically significant difference between the performed R/E treatment rates, according to the need for R/E treatments (p= 0.008). During the initial radiograph 96.1% of the implants were successful and 3.9% had satisfactory survival. At last control 86% of the implants were successful, 10.3% had satisfactory survival, 1% had impairment in survival and 2.8% were unsuccessful. The change in the last control compared to the initial radiograph is statistically significant (p= 0.000) regarding satisfactory survival. Conclusions: Long-term implant survival is not significantly affected by gender, age, type of edentulism, the presence of periodontal disease, R/E treatment needs, implant location, prosthesis type, and the presence of multiple implants.
通过分析牙科全景x线片评估种植体存活:10年回顾性研究
背景/目的:全景x线片已广泛用于种植前评估和治疗方案的准备。全景x线摄影通常是种植体放置的首选方法,因为它提供了颌骨整体形状的信息,上颌窦底和鼻腔底的位置,以及下颌管和颏孔与种植体的垂直位置。本研究的具体目的是通过分析牙科全景x线片来评估种植体的10年生存率。材料与方法:对156例种植体患者507张全景x线片进行回顾性研究。分析了初始口腔健康状况、种植体植入前的修复/牙髓治疗过程、缺牙数量和牙槽病类型、对照组期间种植体相关修复治疗的完成情况、基线/对照组的种植体质量评分和种植体失败情况。结果:研究结果显示,根据R/E治疗的需要,进行R/E治疗的比率差异有统计学意义(p= 0.008)。在最初的x线片中,96.1%的植入物成功,3.9%的植入物存活。最后对照86%的种植体成功,10.3%的种植体生存满意,1%的种植体生存受损,2.8%的种植体不成功。与初始x线片相比,最后一次对照的变化在令人满意的生存方面具有统计学意义(p= 0.000)。结论:性别、年龄、牙槽质类型、牙周病、R/E治疗需求、种植体位置、种植体类型和多种植体存在对种植体长期存活无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信