RECONSIDERATIONS ON THE ACCOUNT OF THE SCYTHIAN FOUNDATION MYTH OF TARGITAEUS IN HERODOTUS

M. Demi̇r
{"title":"RECONSIDERATIONS ON THE ACCOUNT OF THE SCYTHIAN FOUNDATION MYTH OF TARGITAEUS IN HERODOTUS","authors":"M. Demi̇r","doi":"10.16985/mtad.1063892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A critical approach on myth starts by refusing the seductions of romanticism, emphasizing on the particularities of each variant, aiming to identify as best as possible the unnamed narrators, and endeavouring to comprehend the way of the details of a given variant not only correlate with, but actively move forward the interests of the narrator and that fraction of society s/he stands for. From his own statements we learn that Herodotus had traveled through some countries including Scythia. It should be more taken into account that he undertook these journeys simply as a means of collecting evidence for the culture and history of foreign countries and then of using them for writing the History. This is because Herodotus himself points out that his History was also written that the great and wondrous works of non-Greeks may not lose their name. Despite he lived at a period when the Greek-Barbarian antithesis crystallized, he respected and took an interest in the intrinsic values of non-Greeks and was ready to accept foreign cultures on their own terms. Herodotus, especially in his fourth book about the Scythian origins, geography, etnography, culture and history, had held the opportunity to use his own observations and the Greek informants like Aristeas, living in this country, and compared them with the works of early Greek poets and logographers which he did not take for granted. This enabled him to present more credulous, impartial, critical views and informations at times about the origins of Scythians, which seems to have balanced the errors and deficiencies of his race and time. Herodotus cites two myths about the founding of the Scythian dynasty. Targitaeus, transmitted by the Scythians themselves, and the myth of Heracles and the Serpent-Woman brought forward by the Hellenic colonists in the region. He does not comment on the veracity of both myths, preferring to remain neutral, leaving it to the reader. In this article, we will try to reinterpret the Targitaeus myth from a historical point of view, especially in the context of royal symbols representing the establishment of the khanate, by giving examples from the Shahnameh, one of the masterpieces of Iranian-Sassanid literature.","PeriodicalId":320054,"journal":{"name":"Marmara Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marmara Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16985/mtad.1063892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A critical approach on myth starts by refusing the seductions of romanticism, emphasizing on the particularities of each variant, aiming to identify as best as possible the unnamed narrators, and endeavouring to comprehend the way of the details of a given variant not only correlate with, but actively move forward the interests of the narrator and that fraction of society s/he stands for. From his own statements we learn that Herodotus had traveled through some countries including Scythia. It should be more taken into account that he undertook these journeys simply as a means of collecting evidence for the culture and history of foreign countries and then of using them for writing the History. This is because Herodotus himself points out that his History was also written that the great and wondrous works of non-Greeks may not lose their name. Despite he lived at a period when the Greek-Barbarian antithesis crystallized, he respected and took an interest in the intrinsic values of non-Greeks and was ready to accept foreign cultures on their own terms. Herodotus, especially in his fourth book about the Scythian origins, geography, etnography, culture and history, had held the opportunity to use his own observations and the Greek informants like Aristeas, living in this country, and compared them with the works of early Greek poets and logographers which he did not take for granted. This enabled him to present more credulous, impartial, critical views and informations at times about the origins of Scythians, which seems to have balanced the errors and deficiencies of his race and time. Herodotus cites two myths about the founding of the Scythian dynasty. Targitaeus, transmitted by the Scythians themselves, and the myth of Heracles and the Serpent-Woman brought forward by the Hellenic colonists in the region. He does not comment on the veracity of both myths, preferring to remain neutral, leaving it to the reader. In this article, we will try to reinterpret the Targitaeus myth from a historical point of view, especially in the context of royal symbols representing the establishment of the khanate, by giving examples from the Shahnameh, one of the masterpieces of Iranian-Sassanid literature.
希罗多德对斯基泰人建立塔吉塔乌斯神话的再思考
对神话的批判方法首先是拒绝浪漫主义的诱惑,强调每一种变体的特殊性,旨在尽可能最好地识别未命名的叙述者,并努力理解一个给定变体的细节方式不仅与叙述者的利益相关,而且积极地推进叙述者的利益以及他/她所代表的社会部分。从他自己的陈述中,我们得知希罗多德曾游历过包括塞西亚在内的一些国家。更应该考虑的是,他进行这些旅行只是为了收集外国文化和历史的证据,然后用它们来写历史。这是因为希罗多德自己也指出,在他的《历史》一书中,非希腊人的伟大而奇妙的作品可能不会失去他们的名字。尽管他生活在一个希腊人和野蛮人对立鲜明的时期,但他尊重并对非希腊人的内在价值感兴趣,并准备接受外国文化的自己的条件。希罗多德,尤其是在他关于斯基泰起源、地理、民族志、文化和历史的第四本书中,抓住机会利用他自己的观察和像阿里斯泰亚斯这样的希腊线人,生活在这个国家,并将它们与早期希腊诗人和语言学家的作品进行比较,他并不认为这些是理所当然的。这使他能够在关于斯基泰人的起源的问题上提出更容易相信的、公正的、批判性的观点和信息,这似乎平衡了他的种族和时代的错误和不足。希罗多德引用了两个关于斯基泰王朝建立的神话。由斯基泰人自己传播的塔基泰乌斯,以及希腊殖民者在该地区提出的赫拉克勒斯和蛇女的神话。他没有评论这两个神话的真实性,宁愿保持中立,把它留给读者。在本文中,我们将尝试从历史的角度,特别是在代表汗国建立的王室符号的背景下,以伊朗-萨珊文学的代表作之一《沙纳米》为例,重新解读塔吉泰乌斯神话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信