{"title":"Ceeing compassion in care: more than 'Six C'S'?","authors":"S. Pattison, R. Samuriwo","doi":"10.1111/nup.12110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compassion is an apparently simple word. It is, however, actually a highly contested and ambiguous concept which can chase after real content and meaning. But, however, simple it may be or become, the realization of compassion in the UK National Health Service (NHS) is not easy. This is because compassion does not exist as an essence or good that can be dispensed. It is a range of activities and attitudes whose practice is inflected by complex contextual ecologies. In the broader debate about compassion in care, there has been a tendency to focus on the actions or behaviours of healthcare professionals that are perceived to be indicative of ‘compassionate care’. The focus on actions as indicators of compassion is understandable in the light of the shortcomings that have been identified in the care delivered in some parts of the NHS, but it overlooks the complexity of compassion as a state of mind or intellectual outlook. Distinguishing between compassion as a state of mind and actions that show compassion is important, but it can be challenging in health care as there are a myriad of contextual and organization factors that impact on the quality of care such as staffing levels (Ausserhofer et al., 2013; Aiken et al., 2014; Ball et al., 2014). The NHS Commissioning Board Chief Nursing Officer for England and the Department of Health Chief Nursing Adviser (2012) published ‘Compassion in Practice’ which set out their vision and strategy for the delivery of care with compassion to patients by nurses, midwives, and care staff. The aim of this vision and strategy was to ensure that nurses, midwives, and care staff consistently deliver high quality to patients predicated on the six key principles of courage, competence, communication, commitment, care, and compassion (NHS CB CNO England & DH CNA, 2012, NHS, 2014). As a result, over time Compassion in Practice has come to be known colloquially as the ‘6 c’s’ of care. ‘Compassion in Practice’ was initially set out as a three-year strategy to build a culture of compassion in care in the NHS when it was published in 2012. Since then, the delivery of safe, high-quality care has become a priority for governments and healthcare professionals across the globe (Dixon-Woods et al., 2013; Jha et al., 2013; Najjar et al., 2013; Robert et al., 2014). In the UK, the Francis (2013), Berwick et al. (2013), Keogh (2013), Clwyd & Hart (2013), and Andrews & Butler (2014) reports have all underscored the imperative to ensure that patients consistently receive the best possible care with compassion, dignity, and respect. Given that tenure of ‘Compassion in Practice’ is coming to an end, this is an opportune moment to revisit the concept of six c’s of care and to start ‘Ceeing compassion’ in a broader sense.","PeriodicalId":391694,"journal":{"name":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","volume":"17 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Compassion is an apparently simple word. It is, however, actually a highly contested and ambiguous concept which can chase after real content and meaning. But, however, simple it may be or become, the realization of compassion in the UK National Health Service (NHS) is not easy. This is because compassion does not exist as an essence or good that can be dispensed. It is a range of activities and attitudes whose practice is inflected by complex contextual ecologies. In the broader debate about compassion in care, there has been a tendency to focus on the actions or behaviours of healthcare professionals that are perceived to be indicative of ‘compassionate care’. The focus on actions as indicators of compassion is understandable in the light of the shortcomings that have been identified in the care delivered in some parts of the NHS, but it overlooks the complexity of compassion as a state of mind or intellectual outlook. Distinguishing between compassion as a state of mind and actions that show compassion is important, but it can be challenging in health care as there are a myriad of contextual and organization factors that impact on the quality of care such as staffing levels (Ausserhofer et al., 2013; Aiken et al., 2014; Ball et al., 2014). The NHS Commissioning Board Chief Nursing Officer for England and the Department of Health Chief Nursing Adviser (2012) published ‘Compassion in Practice’ which set out their vision and strategy for the delivery of care with compassion to patients by nurses, midwives, and care staff. The aim of this vision and strategy was to ensure that nurses, midwives, and care staff consistently deliver high quality to patients predicated on the six key principles of courage, competence, communication, commitment, care, and compassion (NHS CB CNO England & DH CNA, 2012, NHS, 2014). As a result, over time Compassion in Practice has come to be known colloquially as the ‘6 c’s’ of care. ‘Compassion in Practice’ was initially set out as a three-year strategy to build a culture of compassion in care in the NHS when it was published in 2012. Since then, the delivery of safe, high-quality care has become a priority for governments and healthcare professionals across the globe (Dixon-Woods et al., 2013; Jha et al., 2013; Najjar et al., 2013; Robert et al., 2014). In the UK, the Francis (2013), Berwick et al. (2013), Keogh (2013), Clwyd & Hart (2013), and Andrews & Butler (2014) reports have all underscored the imperative to ensure that patients consistently receive the best possible care with compassion, dignity, and respect. Given that tenure of ‘Compassion in Practice’ is coming to an end, this is an opportune moment to revisit the concept of six c’s of care and to start ‘Ceeing compassion’ in a broader sense.
同情显然是一个简单的词。然而,它实际上是一个高度争议和模糊的概念,可以追求真正的内容和意义。但是,无论如何简单,在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中实现同情心并不容易。这是因为慈悲不是作为一种可以分配的本质或善而存在的。它是一系列活动和态度,其实践受到复杂的环境生态的影响。在更广泛的关于同情护理的辩论中,有一种倾向是关注被认为是“同情护理”的指示的医疗保健专业人员的行动或行为。鉴于在NHS的某些部分所提供的护理中发现的缺点,将行动作为同情心指标的重点是可以理解的,但它忽视了同情心作为一种精神状态或智力前景的复杂性。区分作为一种精神状态的同情和表现同情的行动是很重要的,但在医疗保健中可能具有挑战性,因为有无数的背景和组织因素会影响护理质量,如人员配置水平(Ausserhofer等人,2013;Aiken et al., 2014;Ball et al., 2014)。NHS委托委员会英格兰首席护理官和卫生部首席护理顾问(2012年)发表了“实践中的同情心”,其中阐述了他们的愿景和战略,即护士、助产士和护理人员向患者提供富有同情心的护理。这一愿景和战略的目的是确保护士、助产士和护理人员始终如一地根据勇气、能力、沟通、承诺、护理和同情这六项关键原则为患者提供高质量的服务(NHS CB CNO England & DH CNA, 2012, NHS, 2014)。因此,随着时间的推移,实践中的同情已经被通俗地称为护理的“6c”。“实践中的同情”最初是作为一项为期三年的战略制定的,该战略于2012年发布,旨在在NHS中建立一种关怀关怀的文化。从那时起,提供安全、高质量的护理已成为全球各国政府和医疗保健专业人员的优先事项(Dixon-Woods等人,2013;Jha et al., 2013;Najjar et al., 2013;Robert et al., 2014)。在英国,Francis(2013)、Berwick et al.(2013)、Keogh(2013)、Clwyd & Hart(2013)和Andrews & Butler(2014)的报告都强调了确保患者始终如一地得到尽可能好的关怀、尊严和尊重的必要性。鉴于“实践中的同情”的任期即将结束,这是一个重新审视6c关怀概念并开始在更广泛意义上“看到同情”的时机。