Adaptive Reuse: The Case of Geelong’s Westfield, where Architectural, Urban and Heritage Practices Intersect

Chayakan Siamphukdee, U. De Jong
{"title":"Adaptive Reuse: The Case of Geelong’s Westfield, where Architectural, Urban and Heritage Practices Intersect","authors":"Chayakan Siamphukdee, U. De Jong","doi":"10.55939/a5041pcarc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Westfield lies in the heart of Victoria’s second city, Geelong. The transformation of an entire city block into a shopping complex stemmed from necessity, as the city entered the early phase of deindustrialisation. It involved the redevelopment of an entire urban block with multiple heritage buildings. The project was conceived 50 years ago when the city’s defining wool industry experienced a significant decline following the 1970s global energy crisis and economic slump. This downturn left numerous industrial buildings in central Geelong redundant. This situation challenged the very identity of Geelong, as well as its raison d’etre. While the transformation of the site raises issues to do with urban visioning, the adaptive reuse of multiple significant heritage buildings highlights the intersections and tensions between architectural design and heritage practices.\nThere is great potential in adaptive reuse to mobilise a critical understanding of the environment/city/economy based on engagement with earlier layers of historical development. This paper critically reviews the history of Westfield Geelong by considering the 1970s vision “City by the Bay,” detailing the history of Brougham Street to understand the significance of the site and scrutinising the heritage strategy of facadism adopted in the realisation of Westfield.\nUnderstanding how this development has redefined Geelong as a city is critical to now strategically rethinking a city facing rampant development. This paper argues that the criticality of heritage and adaptive reuse must be recognised, such that the architecture and its narratives can reveal the legacy embedded in the city’s historic structures, be understood within the context of Geelong’s fast-paced self-reinvention through architectural and urban transformations, and be a positive progressive force in the city’s evolving identity.","PeriodicalId":445270,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55939/a5041pcarc","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Westfield lies in the heart of Victoria’s second city, Geelong. The transformation of an entire city block into a shopping complex stemmed from necessity, as the city entered the early phase of deindustrialisation. It involved the redevelopment of an entire urban block with multiple heritage buildings. The project was conceived 50 years ago when the city’s defining wool industry experienced a significant decline following the 1970s global energy crisis and economic slump. This downturn left numerous industrial buildings in central Geelong redundant. This situation challenged the very identity of Geelong, as well as its raison d’etre. While the transformation of the site raises issues to do with urban visioning, the adaptive reuse of multiple significant heritage buildings highlights the intersections and tensions between architectural design and heritage practices. There is great potential in adaptive reuse to mobilise a critical understanding of the environment/city/economy based on engagement with earlier layers of historical development. This paper critically reviews the history of Westfield Geelong by considering the 1970s vision “City by the Bay,” detailing the history of Brougham Street to understand the significance of the site and scrutinising the heritage strategy of facadism adopted in the realisation of Westfield. Understanding how this development has redefined Geelong as a city is critical to now strategically rethinking a city facing rampant development. This paper argues that the criticality of heritage and adaptive reuse must be recognised, such that the architecture and its narratives can reveal the legacy embedded in the city’s historic structures, be understood within the context of Geelong’s fast-paced self-reinvention through architectural and urban transformations, and be a positive progressive force in the city’s evolving identity.
适应性再利用:吉朗的韦斯特菲尔德案例,建筑、城市和遗产实践的交集
韦斯特菲尔德位于维多利亚州第二大城市吉朗的中心。随着城市进入去工业化的早期阶段,整个城市街区转变为购物中心的必要性。它涉及到整个城市街区与多个历史建筑的再开发。该项目是在50年前构思的,当时该市的羊毛产业在20世纪70年代的全球能源危机和经济衰退后经历了重大衰退。经济低迷使得吉隆中部的许多工业建筑变得多余。这种情况挑战了Geelong的身份,以及它存在的理由。虽然场地的改造提出了与城市愿景有关的问题,但多个重要遗产建筑的适应性再利用突出了建筑设计与遗产实践之间的交叉点和紧张关系。适应性再利用有很大的潜力,可以在参与早期历史发展的基础上,调动对环境/城市/经济的批判性理解。本文通过考虑20世纪70年代“海湾之城”的愿景,批判性地回顾了韦斯特菲尔德吉朗的历史,详细介绍了布劳厄姆街的历史,以了解该遗址的重要性,并仔细审查了韦斯特菲尔德实现中采用的法西斯主义遗产战略。了解这种发展如何重新定义吉朗作为一个城市,对于现在战略性地重新思考一个面临猖獗发展的城市至关重要。本文认为,必须认识到遗产和适应性再利用的重要性,这样建筑和它的叙事才能揭示嵌入城市历史建筑中的遗产,在吉朗通过建筑和城市转型的快节奏自我改造的背景下被理解,并成为城市不断发展的身份的积极进步力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信