8. Modernizing Melodrama: The Petrified Forest on American Stage and Screen (1935–1936)

M. Shingler
{"title":"8. Modernizing Melodrama: The Petrified Forest on American Stage and Screen (1935–1936)","authors":"M. Shingler","doi":"10.7312/GLED18066-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In January 1935, Robert E. Sherwood’s play The Petrified Forest began a lucrative six-month run at the Broadhurst Theatre in New York. Within months of it closing, the leading members of the cast reprised their roles at the Warner Bros. film studio in Los Angeles. The film version, released on the 6th February 1936 at the Radio City Music Hall in New York, corresponded closely to the stage production, and it eventually enabled millions of moviegoers around the world to see what less than 250,000 theatre-goers had seen the previous year on Broadway. Since the New York drama critics used the term ‘melodrama’ to describe both the stage-play and the film, The Petrified Forest provides contemporary scholars with an opportunity to consider the state of melodrama in the 1930s. The critical response to both stage-play and film was overwhelmingly positive. Both were deemed to be highly entertaining and were predicted to become box-office hits. Both were also judged to be intelligent, topical, allegorical, poetic, philosophical and well written, acted and produced. The play, for instance, was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. The reviews of the New York drama critics provide no sense that melodrama was being used as a derogatory term or that the form was considered to be outmoded or inferior. There is also no suggestion in the reviews that either the play or the film were best suited to working-class audiences with a taste for heightened emotionalism, fantastically contrived plots or sensational set pieces. Consequently, this example contradicts claims by 20th century scholars that melodrama had become a moribund and devalued form by the 1900s. On the contrary, it proves that melodrama was a vital, credible and popular dramatic form for middle-class audiences and critics, and that it continued to flourish at premier Broadway theatres and first-run cinemas in the 1930s.","PeriodicalId":413062,"journal":{"name":"Melodrama Unbound","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melodrama Unbound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7312/GLED18066-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In January 1935, Robert E. Sherwood’s play The Petrified Forest began a lucrative six-month run at the Broadhurst Theatre in New York. Within months of it closing, the leading members of the cast reprised their roles at the Warner Bros. film studio in Los Angeles. The film version, released on the 6th February 1936 at the Radio City Music Hall in New York, corresponded closely to the stage production, and it eventually enabled millions of moviegoers around the world to see what less than 250,000 theatre-goers had seen the previous year on Broadway. Since the New York drama critics used the term ‘melodrama’ to describe both the stage-play and the film, The Petrified Forest provides contemporary scholars with an opportunity to consider the state of melodrama in the 1930s. The critical response to both stage-play and film was overwhelmingly positive. Both were deemed to be highly entertaining and were predicted to become box-office hits. Both were also judged to be intelligent, topical, allegorical, poetic, philosophical and well written, acted and produced. The play, for instance, was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize. The reviews of the New York drama critics provide no sense that melodrama was being used as a derogatory term or that the form was considered to be outmoded or inferior. There is also no suggestion in the reviews that either the play or the film were best suited to working-class audiences with a taste for heightened emotionalism, fantastically contrived plots or sensational set pieces. Consequently, this example contradicts claims by 20th century scholars that melodrama had become a moribund and devalued form by the 1900s. On the contrary, it proves that melodrama was a vital, credible and popular dramatic form for middle-class audiences and critics, and that it continued to flourish at premier Broadway theatres and first-run cinemas in the 1930s.
8. 现代情节剧:美国舞台和银幕上的石化森林(1935-1936)
1935年1月,罗伯特·e·舍伍德的戏剧《石化森林》在纽约的布罗德赫斯特剧院上演了六个月,利润丰厚。在影片结束后的几个月里,主要演员们在洛杉矶华纳兄弟电影制片厂重新出演了他们的角色。电影版于1936年2月6日在纽约的无线电城音乐厅上映,与舞台剧的制作非常相似,它最终使全世界数百万的电影观众看到了前一年在百老汇不到25万的剧院观众看到的东西。由于纽约戏剧评论家使用“情节剧”一词来描述舞台剧和电影,《石化森林》为当代学者提供了一个考虑20世纪30年代情节剧状态的机会。评论界对舞台剧和电影的反应都非常积极。这两部电影都被认为极具娱乐性,并有望成为票房大片。这两部电影也都被认为是聪明的、话题性的、讽喻的、诗意的、哲学的,而且写作、表演和制作都很好。例如,该剧曾获得普利策奖提名。纽约戏剧评论家的评论并没有说明情节剧被用作贬义词,也没有说明情节剧的形式被认为是过时的或低劣的。在评论中也没有任何迹象表明,这部戏剧或这部电影最适合工薪阶层的观众,他们喜欢强烈的情感主义、虚构的情节或耸人听闻的场景。因此,这个例子与20世纪学者的说法相矛盾,他们认为情节剧在20世纪已经成为一种垂死和贬值的形式。相反,它证明了情节剧对中产阶级观众和评论家来说是一种重要的、可信的、受欢迎的戏剧形式,而且在20世纪30年代,它在百老汇的顶级剧院和第一家电影院继续蓬勃发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信