3. The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and African Societies

K. Kohl
{"title":"3. The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and African Societies","authors":"K. Kohl","doi":"10.14361/9783839450215-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alongside the institutions of local, national and international law, the United Nations also plays an important role in currently on-going legal disputes in Ethiopia, as well as in other African nations, even though it does not want to interfere directly in the internal affairs of these states. Since its direct interventions are strictly limited to peace-building activities and involve long and complicated bureaucratic procedures, one of the UN’s preferred means of contributing to such and other disputes are through the declarations adopted by its General Assembly. These declarations have the character of recommendations and do not contain any legally binding obligations. In the terminology of the UN, they are only ‘documents of intent’. Nevertheless, they try to formulate some principles according to which legal decisions should be taken. This is the case with the UN ‘Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’. As I will show, its primary intent was to grant more rights to the marginalized and long-disenfranchised indigenous peoples of the former European colonies in North and South America, Australia and New Zealand. But the extent to which its principles can also be applied to African societies remains a controversial point of discussion. On the one hand, the Declaration contains a moral appeal to Africa’s political leaders to help their many small-scale local communities to preserve their language and cultural traditions and to protect them from land robbery at the hands of the big international agricultural corporations. On the other hand, there is also the wish of African governments to unify all societies within a given country under one national law.","PeriodicalId":357074,"journal":{"name":"Legal Pluralism in Ethiopia","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Pluralism in Ethiopia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839450215-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Alongside the institutions of local, national and international law, the United Nations also plays an important role in currently on-going legal disputes in Ethiopia, as well as in other African nations, even though it does not want to interfere directly in the internal affairs of these states. Since its direct interventions are strictly limited to peace-building activities and involve long and complicated bureaucratic procedures, one of the UN’s preferred means of contributing to such and other disputes are through the declarations adopted by its General Assembly. These declarations have the character of recommendations and do not contain any legally binding obligations. In the terminology of the UN, they are only ‘documents of intent’. Nevertheless, they try to formulate some principles according to which legal decisions should be taken. This is the case with the UN ‘Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’. As I will show, its primary intent was to grant more rights to the marginalized and long-disenfranchised indigenous peoples of the former European colonies in North and South America, Australia and New Zealand. But the extent to which its principles can also be applied to African societies remains a controversial point of discussion. On the one hand, the Declaration contains a moral appeal to Africa’s political leaders to help their many small-scale local communities to preserve their language and cultural traditions and to protect them from land robbery at the hands of the big international agricultural corporations. On the other hand, there is also the wish of African governments to unify all societies within a given country under one national law.
3.《联合国土著人民和非洲社会权利宣言》
除了地方、国家和国际法机构外,联合国在埃塞俄比亚以及其他非洲国家目前正在进行的法律纠纷中也发挥着重要作用,尽管它不想直接干涉这些国家的内政。由于联合国的直接干预严格限于和平建设活动,并涉及漫长而复杂的官僚程序,联合国解决这类和其他争端的首选方式之一是通过大会通过的宣言。这些声明具有建议的性质,不包含任何具有法律约束力的义务。用联合国的术语来说,它们只是“意向书”。然而,他们试图制定一些原则,根据这些原则应该采取法律决定。联合国《土著人民权利宣言》就是这样。正如我将表明的那样,其主要意图是给予北美和南美、澳大利亚和新西兰前欧洲殖民地边缘化和长期被剥夺公民权的土著人民更多权利。但是,它的原则在多大程度上也适用于非洲社会,仍然是一个有争议的讨论点。一方面,《宣言》在道义上呼吁非洲的政治领导人帮助其许多小规模的地方社区保存其语言和文化传统,并保护他们免受大型国际农业公司的土地掠夺。另一方面,非洲各国政府也希望将一个国家内的所有社会统一在一个国家法律之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信