When Do Robots have Free Will? Exploring the Relationships between (Attributions of) Consciousness and Free Will

Eddy A. Nahmias, Corey H. Allen, B. Loveall
{"title":"When Do Robots have Free Will? Exploring the Relationships between (Attributions of) Consciousness and Free Will","authors":"Eddy A. Nahmias, Corey H. Allen, B. Loveall","doi":"10.1163/9789004409965_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imagine that, in the future, humans develop the technology to construct humanoid robots with very sophisticated computers instead of brains and with bodies made out of metal, plastic, and synthetic materials. The robots look, talk, and act just like humans and are able to integrate into human society and to interact with humans across any situation. They work in our offices and our restaurants, teach in our schools, and discuss the important matters of the day in our bars and coffeehouses. How do you suppose you’d respond to one of these robots if you were to discover them attempting to steal your wallet or insulting your friend? Would you regard them as free and morally responsible agents, genuinely deserving of blame and punishment? If you’re like most people, you are more likely to regard these robots as having free will and being morally responsible if you believe that they are conscious rather than non-conscious. That is, if you think that the robots actually experience sensations and emotions, you are more likely to regard them as having free will and being morally responsible than if you think they simply behave like humans based on their internal programming but with no conscious experiences at all. But why do many people have this intuition? Philosophers and scientists typically assume that there is a deep connection between consciousness and free will, but few have developed theories to explain this connection. To the extent that they have, it’s typically via some cognitive capacity thought to be important for free will, such as reasoning or deliberation, that consciousness is supposed to enable or bolster, at least in humans. But this sort of connection between consciousness and free will is relatively weak. First, it’s contingent; given our particular cognitive architecture, it holds, but if robots or aliens could carry out the relevant cognitive capacities without being conscious, this would suggest that consciousness is not constitutive of, or essential for, free will. Second, this connection is derivative, since the main connection goes through some capacity other than consciousness. Finally, this connection","PeriodicalId":333678,"journal":{"name":"Free Will, Causality, and Neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Free Will, Causality, and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409965_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Imagine that, in the future, humans develop the technology to construct humanoid robots with very sophisticated computers instead of brains and with bodies made out of metal, plastic, and synthetic materials. The robots look, talk, and act just like humans and are able to integrate into human society and to interact with humans across any situation. They work in our offices and our restaurants, teach in our schools, and discuss the important matters of the day in our bars and coffeehouses. How do you suppose you’d respond to one of these robots if you were to discover them attempting to steal your wallet or insulting your friend? Would you regard them as free and morally responsible agents, genuinely deserving of blame and punishment? If you’re like most people, you are more likely to regard these robots as having free will and being morally responsible if you believe that they are conscious rather than non-conscious. That is, if you think that the robots actually experience sensations and emotions, you are more likely to regard them as having free will and being morally responsible than if you think they simply behave like humans based on their internal programming but with no conscious experiences at all. But why do many people have this intuition? Philosophers and scientists typically assume that there is a deep connection between consciousness and free will, but few have developed theories to explain this connection. To the extent that they have, it’s typically via some cognitive capacity thought to be important for free will, such as reasoning or deliberation, that consciousness is supposed to enable or bolster, at least in humans. But this sort of connection between consciousness and free will is relatively weak. First, it’s contingent; given our particular cognitive architecture, it holds, but if robots or aliens could carry out the relevant cognitive capacities without being conscious, this would suggest that consciousness is not constitutive of, or essential for, free will. Second, this connection is derivative, since the main connection goes through some capacity other than consciousness. Finally, this connection
机器人何时有自由意志?探索意识(归因)与自由意志的关系
想象一下,在未来,人类发展出一种技术,用非常复杂的计算机代替大脑,用金属、塑料和合成材料制成的身体来建造类人机器人。这些机器人看起来、说话和行动都和人类一样,能够融入人类社会,在任何情况下都能与人类互动。他们在我们的办公室和餐馆工作,在我们的学校教书,在我们的酒吧和咖啡馆讨论当天的重要事件。如果你发现其中一个机器人试图偷你的钱包或侮辱你的朋友,你认为你会如何反应?你会认为他们是自由的、道德上负责任的人,真正应该受到指责和惩罚吗?如果你和大多数人一样,如果你相信这些机器人是有意识的,而不是无意识的,你就更有可能认为它们有自由意志,有道德责任感。也就是说,如果你认为机器人确实有感觉和情感,你更有可能认为它们有自由意志,有道德责任感,而不是认为它们只是像人类一样根据内部程序行事,但根本没有意识经验。但为什么很多人有这种直觉呢?哲学家和科学家通常认为意识和自由意志之间存在着深刻的联系,但很少有人提出理论来解释这种联系。从某种程度上说,它通常是通过一些被认为对自由意志很重要的认知能力来实现的,比如推理或审议,意识应该能够或支持,至少在人类中是这样。但意识和自由意志之间的这种联系相对较弱。首先,它是偶然的;考虑到我们特定的认知结构,它成立,但如果机器人或外星人可以在没有意识的情况下执行相关的认知能力,这将表明意识不是自由意志的组成部分,也不是自由意志的必要条件。其次,这种联系是派生的,因为主要的联系是通过意识以外的某种能力进行的。最后,这个联系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信