Chinese SMEs in Germany: an exploratory study on OFDI motives and the role of China’s institutional environment

Fabian Hänle, S. Weil, B. Cambré
{"title":"Chinese SMEs in Germany: an exploratory study on OFDI motives and the role of China’s institutional environment","authors":"Fabian Hänle, S. Weil, B. Cambré","doi":"10.1108/MBR-09-2020-0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to use the institutional perspective to jointly explore the underlying motives that drive Chinese private small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to invest in the developed economy of Germany and the role China’s institutional environment is playing in this context.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nGiven the lack of recent in-depth studies, the authors use multiple case study method to present rich insights from elite interviews with executives belonging to seven Chinese SMEs and industry experts, as well as the study of firm documents, social media and the latest governmental policies.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate not only market-, resource- and strategic asset-seeking motives, but contrary to the literature, also efficiency-seeking goals. Further driving factors are the integration in global value chains and high degrees of entrepreneurial orientation. The second major finding is that China’s institutional environment induces widely divergent effects. Its ministries established new outward foreign direct investments (OFDI) support measures that are beneficial for some SMEs’ post-entry operations. However, some firms are not aware of any support measures or suffer from discrimination that hinders innovation and from which they try to escape by investing abroad.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper considers different levels of analysis (firm, entrepreneur, institutional environment) to investigate Chinese SMEs’ motives in Europe’s largest market. By examining why and how these firms use OFDI to a developed economy, the authors address an essential question for China’s economy that is of primary political and academic concern (“How can China get that improved innovation that often seeds entrepreneurial growth?”). In addition, the study contributes to the growing discussion of institutional escapism in emerging markets by revealing five institutional hardships Chinese SMEs are facing and how this relates to their internationalization.\n","PeriodicalId":108650,"journal":{"name":"The Multinational Business Review","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Multinational Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-09-2020-0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to use the institutional perspective to jointly explore the underlying motives that drive Chinese private small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to invest in the developed economy of Germany and the role China’s institutional environment is playing in this context. Design/methodology/approach Given the lack of recent in-depth studies, the authors use multiple case study method to present rich insights from elite interviews with executives belonging to seven Chinese SMEs and industry experts, as well as the study of firm documents, social media and the latest governmental policies. Findings The results indicate not only market-, resource- and strategic asset-seeking motives, but contrary to the literature, also efficiency-seeking goals. Further driving factors are the integration in global value chains and high degrees of entrepreneurial orientation. The second major finding is that China’s institutional environment induces widely divergent effects. Its ministries established new outward foreign direct investments (OFDI) support measures that are beneficial for some SMEs’ post-entry operations. However, some firms are not aware of any support measures or suffer from discrimination that hinders innovation and from which they try to escape by investing abroad. Originality/value This paper considers different levels of analysis (firm, entrepreneur, institutional environment) to investigate Chinese SMEs’ motives in Europe’s largest market. By examining why and how these firms use OFDI to a developed economy, the authors address an essential question for China’s economy that is of primary political and academic concern (“How can China get that improved innovation that often seeds entrepreneurial growth?”). In addition, the study contributes to the growing discussion of institutional escapism in emerging markets by revealing five institutional hardships Chinese SMEs are facing and how this relates to their internationalization.
在德中国中小企业:对外直接投资动机及中国制度环境作用的探索性研究
本文旨在运用制度视角,共同探讨推动中国民营中小企业投资德国发达经济体的潜在动机,以及中国制度环境在这一背景下所起的作用。设计/方法/方法:鉴于近期缺乏深入研究,作者采用多案例研究方法,通过对七家中国中小企业高管和行业专家的精英访谈,以及对公司文件、社交媒体和最新政府政策的研究,呈现丰富的见解。研究结果表明,企业不仅具有市场、资源和战略资产的追求动机,而且与文献相反,还具有效率追求的目标。进一步的驱动因素是全球价值链的整合和高度的创业导向。第二个主要发现是,中国的制度环境导致了广泛不同的影响。各部委制定了新的对外直接投资(OFDI)支持措施,有利于一些中小企业进入后的经营。然而,一些公司没有意识到任何支持措施或遭受阻碍创新的歧视,他们试图通过在国外投资来逃避。原创性/价值本文从企业、企业家、制度环境等不同层面分析中国中小企业进入欧洲最大市场的动机。通过研究这些公司为何以及如何将对外直接投资用于发达经济体,作者解决了中国经济的一个基本问题,这个问题是政治和学术界关注的主要问题(“中国如何才能提高创新水平,这种创新往往是企业家成长的种子?”)。此外,该研究通过揭示中国中小企业面临的五大制度困境及其与国际化的关系,为新兴市场制度逃避主义的讨论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信