Usporedba učinkovitosti različitih vrsta zaštitnih maski u smanjenju prijenosa virusa SARS-CoV-2

Irena Kovačević, Ivona Papić, Štefanija Ozimec Vulinec, Karla Kovačević Čorak, Ana Marija Hošnjak, Valentina Krikšić
{"title":"Usporedba učinkovitosti različitih vrsta zaštitnih maski u smanjenju prijenosa virusa SARS-CoV-2","authors":"Irena Kovačević, Ivona Papić, Štefanija Ozimec Vulinec, Karla Kovačević Čorak, Ana Marija Hošnjak, Valentina Krikšić","doi":"10.24141/2/7/1/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Protective equipment has become globally used to protect against respiratory infections in healthcare workers and sick patients. With the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the global pandemic, the role of protective masks in reducing the transmission of the new virus has become the subject of much research. Although the protective mask has a significant role in reducing the transmission of infections, wearing it also has certain adverse effects. Aim. The aim of this review is to show the effectiveness of different types of protective masks in reducing the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as well as the comparison of adverse effects when wearing protective masks. Methods. The method for analyzing the topic of the effectiveness of protective masks included reviews of papers found on the Google search engine, Medline database (via PubMed) and Hrcak. Included in the analysis are scientific papers with clinical trials or review papers, in English and Croatian, regardless of methodology, published since 2020. Included works include topics such as medical masks, respirators, cloth masks and their materials, effectiveness and importance of use, and adverse effects of wearing protective masks. A total of 2,110 articles, original and review papers were found, of which, after a detailed reading and analysis of several authors, 11 were selected that meet the eligibility criteria of this review paper.Results. There are filter half-masks with/without valve, surgical masks and hygienic or cloth masks. A surgical mask may provide better protection than a cloth mask, although this may depend on the layers and material the masks are made of. Respirator masks are somewhat more effective than surgical masks, but the difference turned out to be insignificant. The most common side effects of wearing masks for a long time are increased secretion of sputum, cough, dyspnea, difficulty when communicating, lack of closeness and feelings of insecurity. Conclusion. A face mask protects against infection and is associated with a reduced risk of infection. The habit of wearing a mask and the correct way of wearing it proved to be important factors in reducing the risk of infection.","PeriodicalId":293897,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Nursing Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24141/2/7/1/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Protective equipment has become globally used to protect against respiratory infections in healthcare workers and sick patients. With the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the global pandemic, the role of protective masks in reducing the transmission of the new virus has become the subject of much research. Although the protective mask has a significant role in reducing the transmission of infections, wearing it also has certain adverse effects. Aim. The aim of this review is to show the effectiveness of different types of protective masks in reducing the transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as well as the comparison of adverse effects when wearing protective masks. Methods. The method for analyzing the topic of the effectiveness of protective masks included reviews of papers found on the Google search engine, Medline database (via PubMed) and Hrcak. Included in the analysis are scientific papers with clinical trials or review papers, in English and Croatian, regardless of methodology, published since 2020. Included works include topics such as medical masks, respirators, cloth masks and their materials, effectiveness and importance of use, and adverse effects of wearing protective masks. A total of 2,110 articles, original and review papers were found, of which, after a detailed reading and analysis of several authors, 11 were selected that meet the eligibility criteria of this review paper.Results. There are filter half-masks with/without valve, surgical masks and hygienic or cloth masks. A surgical mask may provide better protection than a cloth mask, although this may depend on the layers and material the masks are made of. Respirator masks are somewhat more effective than surgical masks, but the difference turned out to be insignificant. The most common side effects of wearing masks for a long time are increased secretion of sputum, cough, dyspnea, difficulty when communicating, lack of closeness and feelings of insecurity. Conclusion. A face mask protects against infection and is associated with a reduced risk of infection. The habit of wearing a mask and the correct way of wearing it proved to be important factors in reducing the risk of infection.
介绍。防护设备已在全球范围内用于预防卫生保健工作者和病人的呼吸道感染。随着SARS-CoV-2病毒的出现和全球大流行,防护口罩在减少新病毒传播中的作用已成为许多研究的主题。防护口罩虽然在减少感染传播方面有显著作用,但佩戴也有一定的不良影响。的目标。本综述的目的是展示不同类型防护口罩在减少SARS-CoV-2病毒传播方面的有效性,以及佩戴防护口罩时不良反应的比较。方法。分析防护口罩有效性主题的方法包括对谷歌搜索引擎、Medline数据库(通过PubMed)和Hrcak上找到的论文的评论。该分析包括自2020年以来发表的带有临床试验或评论论文的科学论文,无论方法如何,均使用英语和克罗地亚语。收录的作品包括医用口罩、呼吸器、布口罩及其材料、使用的有效性和重要性以及佩戴防护口罩的不利影响等主题。共检索到2110篇论文、原创论文和综述论文,经过对多位作者的详细阅读和分析,从中筛选出11篇符合本文的入选标准。有带/不带阀的过滤式半口罩、外科口罩、卫生口罩或布口罩。外科口罩可能比布口罩提供更好的保护,尽管这可能取决于口罩的层数和材料。防护口罩比医用口罩更有效,但差异并不明显。长期戴口罩最常见的副作用是痰液分泌增多、咳嗽、呼吸困难、沟通困难、缺乏亲密感和不安全感。结论。口罩可以防止感染,并与降低感染风险有关。事实证明,佩戴口罩的习惯和正确的佩戴方式是降低感染风险的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信