An Evaluation Model of Problem-Based Learner Assessment in Curriculum 2013

Y. Wijayanti
{"title":"An Evaluation Model of Problem-Based Learner Assessment in Curriculum 2013","authors":"Y. Wijayanti","doi":"10.24071/ijels.v1i2.345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Curriculum 2013 has just been implemented at schools in Indonesia, and its implementationhas brought pros and cons among academicians. One of the major constructive criticismsrelated to the implementation of curriculum 2013 deals with the application of the creation.Bloom claims that creating places the top level among the thinking skills (Pohl, 2000).Furthermore, Dyers (2011) states that the main goal of each learning process is to improvethe learners? creativity. This paper focuses on the evaluation of learner assessment; hence, itaims to propose an alternative model of learner assessment based on curriculum 2013 byfocusing on the concept of scientific approach especially on creation and also the concept ofpositivism. Moreover, the result of Forum Group Discussion (FGD) shows positive feedback.The findings obtained from FGD generally show more positive feedback than the negativeone. In brief, it can be concluded that the model has been better because it provides creation,clear description, and it may encourage building positive characters of the learners.Keywords: evaluation model, problem based, learner assessment, creation, scientific approach, positivism","PeriodicalId":406723,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v1i2.345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Curriculum 2013 has just been implemented at schools in Indonesia, and its implementationhas brought pros and cons among academicians. One of the major constructive criticismsrelated to the implementation of curriculum 2013 deals with the application of the creation.Bloom claims that creating places the top level among the thinking skills (Pohl, 2000).Furthermore, Dyers (2011) states that the main goal of each learning process is to improvethe learners? creativity. This paper focuses on the evaluation of learner assessment; hence, itaims to propose an alternative model of learner assessment based on curriculum 2013 byfocusing on the concept of scientific approach especially on creation and also the concept ofpositivism. Moreover, the result of Forum Group Discussion (FGD) shows positive feedback.The findings obtained from FGD generally show more positive feedback than the negativeone. In brief, it can be concluded that the model has been better because it provides creation,clear description, and it may encourage building positive characters of the learners.Keywords: evaluation model, problem based, learner assessment, creation, scientific approach, positivism
基于问题的课程学习者评价模型2013
2013年课程刚刚在印度尼西亚的学校实施,它的实施在学术界引起了赞成和反对。与2013年课程实施相关的主要建设性批评之一是关于创作的应用。Bloom声称,创造是思维技能的最高层次(Pohl, 2000)。此外,Dyers(2011)指出,每个学习过程的主要目标是提高学习者的能力。创造力。本文主要研究学习者评价的评价;因此,本文旨在提出一种基于2013年课程的替代学习者评估模型,重点关注科学方法的概念,特别是创造和实证主义的概念。此外,论坛小组讨论(FGD)的结果显示出积极的反馈。从FGD得到的结果通常显示出更多的积极反馈而不是消极反馈。简而言之,可以得出结论,该模型已经更好,因为它提供了创造性,清晰的描述,它可以鼓励学习者建立积极的性格。关键词:评价模式、问题导向、学习者评价、创新、科学方法、实证主义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信