H. Shimpo, C. Ohkubo, Noboru Kawamura, K. Kurtz, Y. Kokubo, Tatsuya Suzuki, T. Hosoi
{"title":"A Procera® Custom Abutment Fabricated by Scanning the Provisional Abutment","authors":"H. Shimpo, C. Ohkubo, Noboru Kawamura, K. Kurtz, Y. Kokubo, Tatsuya Suzuki, T. Hosoi","doi":"10.2186/PRP.6.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient: The patient was a 56-year-old male presenting with a missing maxillary right central incisor. Subsequently, an endosseous implant was fiited. After a 6 month healing period, a provisional abutment was fabricated to an optimal shape on the provisional titanium component. After confirming custom-guided tissue healing and appropriate emergence profile, the provisional abutment was scanned using the Procera® scanner. The CAD/CAM custom titanium definitive abutment and the definitive porcelain fused to the metal crown were delivered as an esthetic implant restoration.Discussion: Compared to conventional procedures, the following advantages can be seen: 1. There is no access hole in the provisional restorations. 2. Appropriate soft-tissue contours can be induced by modification of provisional restoration. 3. A definitive abutment with the identical contours can be reliably obtained using CAM. 4. An extra temporary plastic component is not necessary. The disadvantages are: 1. The provisional abutment using the temporary cylinder has to be made. 2. The Procera® scanner has to be set up chair-side. 3. The patient has to wait during scanning.Conclusion: A custom Procera® abutment with an ideal emergence profile can be fabricated by scanning the provisional abutment with appropriate soft-tissue contours.","PeriodicalId":306414,"journal":{"name":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/PRP.6.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patient: The patient was a 56-year-old male presenting with a missing maxillary right central incisor. Subsequently, an endosseous implant was fiited. After a 6 month healing period, a provisional abutment was fabricated to an optimal shape on the provisional titanium component. After confirming custom-guided tissue healing and appropriate emergence profile, the provisional abutment was scanned using the Procera® scanner. The CAD/CAM custom titanium definitive abutment and the definitive porcelain fused to the metal crown were delivered as an esthetic implant restoration.Discussion: Compared to conventional procedures, the following advantages can be seen: 1. There is no access hole in the provisional restorations. 2. Appropriate soft-tissue contours can be induced by modification of provisional restoration. 3. A definitive abutment with the identical contours can be reliably obtained using CAM. 4. An extra temporary plastic component is not necessary. The disadvantages are: 1. The provisional abutment using the temporary cylinder has to be made. 2. The Procera® scanner has to be set up chair-side. 3. The patient has to wait during scanning.Conclusion: A custom Procera® abutment with an ideal emergence profile can be fabricated by scanning the provisional abutment with appropriate soft-tissue contours.