POLICY MODEL FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AS A PROOF TOOL IN CRIMINALACTION AFTER THE APPLICATION OF LAW NO 19 OF 2016

Muh. Hambali
{"title":"POLICY MODEL FOR THE USE OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AS A PROOF TOOL IN CRIMINALACTION AFTER THE APPLICATION OF LAW NO 19 OF 2016","authors":"Muh. Hambali","doi":"10.36356/ulrev.v3i1.1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the policy model of the use of electronic documents as evidence in criminal acts based on Law No. 19 of 2016. The development of information technology has significantly transformed the conventional socialization system into a digital system. This affects the emergence of new legal actions in a community. The form of the new legal action needs to be adjusted and harmonized with existing legislation, such as the use of electronic documents as evidence that will be used as a means of verification in court. Based on the analysis it was revealed that Law No. 19 of 2016 as a legal umbrella for regulating criminal acts in cyberspace is still experiencing many obstacles, therefore it must be harmonized with the relevant criminal law because if it is different then it will cause legal imbalance so that it will increasingly make it difficult for law enforcers to enforce the law.","PeriodicalId":259996,"journal":{"name":"UNTAG Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNTAG Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36356/ulrev.v3i1.1062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the policy model of the use of electronic documents as evidence in criminal acts based on Law No. 19 of 2016. The development of information technology has significantly transformed the conventional socialization system into a digital system. This affects the emergence of new legal actions in a community. The form of the new legal action needs to be adjusted and harmonized with existing legislation, such as the use of electronic documents as evidence that will be used as a means of verification in court. Based on the analysis it was revealed that Law No. 19 of 2016 as a legal umbrella for regulating criminal acts in cyberspace is still experiencing many obstacles, therefore it must be harmonized with the relevant criminal law because if it is different then it will cause legal imbalance so that it will increasingly make it difficult for law enforcers to enforce the law.
2016年第19号法律适用后刑事诉讼中使用电子文件作为证明工具的政策模式
本文旨在以2016年第19号法为依据,分析电子文件作为刑事证据的政策模式。信息技术的发展使传统的社会化系统向数字化系统转变。这影响了社区中新法律行为的出现。新的法律诉讼的形式需要与现有立法进行调整和协调,例如使用电子文件作为证据,将在法庭上用作核查手段。在分析的基础上发现,2016年第19号法作为规制网络空间犯罪行为的法律保护伞,仍然存在许多障碍,因此必须与相关刑法相协调,因为如果它不同,就会造成法律上的不平衡,从而使执法人员越来越难以执法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信