SHape REtrieval contest 2008: Generic models

Ryutarou Ohbuchi
{"title":"SHape REtrieval contest 2008: Generic models","authors":"Ryutarou Ohbuchi","doi":"10.1109/SMI.2008.4547978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first of the SHREC series of 3D model retrieval contests, SHREC 2006 [5] organized by Prof. Veltkamp et al. has made an impact in the way researchers compare performances of their 3D model retrieval methods. The task was to retrieve polygon soup models found in the Princeton Shape Benchmark database [5] having diverse shape and semantics. While many researchers used the SHREC 2006 as their benchmark, there has been no “official” contest since 2006 that used the same SHREC 2006 format but with up-to-date algorithms and methods. The SHREC 2007 added new tracks, e.g., for 3D face models, watertight models, protein models, CAD models, partial matching, and relevance feedback. However, the format of SHREC 2006 was missing. This SHREC 2008 Generic Models Track (GMT) tries to repeat the SHREC 2006 so that we can compare state-of-the-art methods for polygon soup models by using a stable benchmark dataset and ground truth classifications. A change from the SHREC 2006 to the SHREC 2008 GMT is the acknowledgement of learning based algorithms for 3D model retrieval. The SHREC 2008 GMT has two entry categories depending on if supervised learning is used or not. We wanted to encourage various forms of learning algorithms, as we believe learning algorithms are as essential as features themselves for effective 3D model retrieval. At the same time, we do not want to discourage methods without supervised learning. So we created two sub-tracks, one for unsupervised methods and the other for supervised methods. To test the behavior of supervised method for the queries having “unseen” ground truth classifications, we added a new set of queries, in addition to the original set of queries used in the SHREC 2006.","PeriodicalId":118774,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMI.2008.4547978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The first of the SHREC series of 3D model retrieval contests, SHREC 2006 [5] organized by Prof. Veltkamp et al. has made an impact in the way researchers compare performances of their 3D model retrieval methods. The task was to retrieve polygon soup models found in the Princeton Shape Benchmark database [5] having diverse shape and semantics. While many researchers used the SHREC 2006 as their benchmark, there has been no “official” contest since 2006 that used the same SHREC 2006 format but with up-to-date algorithms and methods. The SHREC 2007 added new tracks, e.g., for 3D face models, watertight models, protein models, CAD models, partial matching, and relevance feedback. However, the format of SHREC 2006 was missing. This SHREC 2008 Generic Models Track (GMT) tries to repeat the SHREC 2006 so that we can compare state-of-the-art methods for polygon soup models by using a stable benchmark dataset and ground truth classifications. A change from the SHREC 2006 to the SHREC 2008 GMT is the acknowledgement of learning based algorithms for 3D model retrieval. The SHREC 2008 GMT has two entry categories depending on if supervised learning is used or not. We wanted to encourage various forms of learning algorithms, as we believe learning algorithms are as essential as features themselves for effective 3D model retrieval. At the same time, we do not want to discourage methods without supervised learning. So we created two sub-tracks, one for unsupervised methods and the other for supervised methods. To test the behavior of supervised method for the queries having “unseen” ground truth classifications, we added a new set of queries, in addition to the original set of queries used in the SHREC 2006.
形状检索竞赛2008:通用模型
由Veltkamp教授等人组织的SHREC 2006[5]是SHREC系列3D模型检索比赛的第一场比赛,对研究人员比较其3D模型检索方法的性能产生了影响。任务是检索普林斯顿形状基准数据库[5]中具有不同形状和语义的多边形汤模型。虽然许多研究人员将《SHREC 2006》作为基准,但自2006年以来,就没有“官方”竞赛使用与《SHREC 2006》相同的格式,但采用了最新的算法和方法。SHREC 2007增加了新的轨道,例如3D面部模型、水密模型、蛋白质模型、CAD模型、部分匹配和相关反馈。然而,SHREC 2006的格式却缺失了。这个SHREC 2008通用模型跟踪(GMT)试图重复SHREC 2006,这样我们就可以通过使用稳定的基准数据集和ground truth分类来比较最先进的多边形汤模型方法。从SHREC 2006到SHREC 2008 GMT的一个变化是承认基于学习的3D模型检索算法。根据是否使用监督学习,SHREC 2008 GMT有两个条目类别。我们希望鼓励各种形式的学习算法,因为我们相信学习算法和特征本身一样重要,可以有效地检索3D模型。同时,我们也不反对没有监督学习的方法。所以我们创建了两个子轨道,一个用于无监督方法,另一个用于有监督方法。为了测试监督方法对具有“看不见的”真实分类的查询的行为,我们在SHREC 2006中使用的原始查询集之外添加了一组新的查询集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信