{"title":"Painting Into A Corner: The Pedagogic Agenda, the Immersive Mediation (and the Overdetermined Experience) of ‘Play Van Abbe 4’","authors":"A. Bartholomew","doi":"10.54533/stedstud.vol004.art06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Play Van Abbe 4: The Pilgrim, the Tourist, the Flâneur (and the Worker) (2011), the final installment of the experimental, Play Van Abbe program at the Van Abbemuseum – invited viewers to play one of four ‘roles’, each of which entailed a different mode of engagement. The pilgrim sought divine inspiration, the tourist an encounter with something unusual. The flâneur strolled along in passive observance while the worker, not merely a consumer of experience, produced in return. To engender these perspectives role-specific ‘tools’ for art mediation were extended to the exhibition’s visitors. While not explicitly fetishized on pedestals or in vitrines, mediation was the overriding object and subject of Play Van Abbe 4. Works such as Richard Long’s Wood Circle (1977), James Lee Byars’ Hear TH FI TO IN PH Around this Chair (1978), and Oliver Ressler’s What is Democracy? (2009), functioned merely as a backdrop. Each of the artworks included could have been exchanged with any other. In such a situation it is imperative to ask: in the midst of so much discursive and immersive mediation is there any space left in the museum for art?","PeriodicalId":143043,"journal":{"name":"Stedelijk Studies Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stedelijk Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54533/stedstud.vol004.art06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Play Van Abbe 4: The Pilgrim, the Tourist, the Flâneur (and the Worker) (2011), the final installment of the experimental, Play Van Abbe program at the Van Abbemuseum – invited viewers to play one of four ‘roles’, each of which entailed a different mode of engagement. The pilgrim sought divine inspiration, the tourist an encounter with something unusual. The flâneur strolled along in passive observance while the worker, not merely a consumer of experience, produced in return. To engender these perspectives role-specific ‘tools’ for art mediation were extended to the exhibition’s visitors. While not explicitly fetishized on pedestals or in vitrines, mediation was the overriding object and subject of Play Van Abbe 4. Works such as Richard Long’s Wood Circle (1977), James Lee Byars’ Hear TH FI TO IN PH Around this Chair (1978), and Oliver Ressler’s What is Democracy? (2009), functioned merely as a backdrop. Each of the artworks included could have been exchanged with any other. In such a situation it is imperative to ask: in the midst of so much discursive and immersive mediation is there any space left in the museum for art?
《扮演范·阿贝4:朝圣者、游客、流浪者(和工人)》(2011)是范·阿贝博物馆实验性“扮演范·阿贝”项目的最后一部分,邀请观众扮演四个“角色”中的一个,每个角色都需要不同的参与模式。朝圣者寻求神圣的灵感,游客则遇到了一些不寻常的事情。flneur在被动地观察中漫步,而工作者,不仅仅是经验的消费者,则生产作为回报。为了产生这些观点,艺术调解的角色特定的“工具”被扩展到展览的参观者。虽然没有被明确地崇拜在基座上或玻璃橱窗上,但调解是Play Van Abbe 4的首要对象和主题。如理查德·朗的《木圈》(1977),詹姆斯·李·拜尔斯的《在这张椅子周围听我说》(1978),奥利弗·雷斯勒的《什么是民主?》(2009),只是作为一个背景。其中的每一件艺术品都可以相互交换。在这种情况下,我们必须问:在如此多的话语和沉浸式调解中,博物馆还有艺术空间吗?