Get it? Got it! Good! Enhancing New Product Acceptance by Facilitating Resolution of Extreme Incongruity

Susan Jung Grant, Margaret C. Campbell, J. Jhang
{"title":"Get it? Got it! Good! Enhancing New Product Acceptance by Facilitating Resolution of Extreme Incongruity","authors":"Susan Jung Grant, Margaret C. Campbell, J. Jhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1693188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highly innovative products may offer consumers greater benefits than incrementally new products, yet they have a higher failure rate. The present research addresses the challenge faced by new products that are extremely different from existing offerings by drawing on theorizing regarding the evaluation of schema incongruity. Specifically, the authors posit that consumers’ acceptance of extremely incongruent products will be increased by strategies that facilitate cognitive flexibility and thereby the likelihood that consumers will be able to make sense of incongruent new products. The authors examine the influence of three manipulations of cognitive flexibility – positive affect, a future (vs. past) launch description, and a cognitive flexibility prime – on evaluations of new products. Results from four experiments show that these factors enhance participants’ evaluations of extremely incongruent new products by facilitating ability to make sense of the new products. Results also indicate that understanding of the benefits provided by extremely new products, rather than affect arising from resolution, leads to higher evaluations of these products.","PeriodicalId":344620,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship & Marketing eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1693188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Highly innovative products may offer consumers greater benefits than incrementally new products, yet they have a higher failure rate. The present research addresses the challenge faced by new products that are extremely different from existing offerings by drawing on theorizing regarding the evaluation of schema incongruity. Specifically, the authors posit that consumers’ acceptance of extremely incongruent products will be increased by strategies that facilitate cognitive flexibility and thereby the likelihood that consumers will be able to make sense of incongruent new products. The authors examine the influence of three manipulations of cognitive flexibility – positive affect, a future (vs. past) launch description, and a cognitive flexibility prime – on evaluations of new products. Results from four experiments show that these factors enhance participants’ evaluations of extremely incongruent new products by facilitating ability to make sense of the new products. Results also indicate that understanding of the benefits provided by extremely new products, rather than affect arising from resolution, leads to higher evaluations of these products.
明白了吗?得到它!好!通过促进解决极端不一致,提高新产品的接受度
高度创新的产品可能比渐进式的新产品给消费者带来更大的好处,但它们的失败率更高。本研究通过对图式不一致性评价的理论化,解决了新产品与现有产品截然不同所面临的挑战。具体来说,作者认为,通过促进认知灵活性的策略,消费者对极不一致的产品的接受度将会增加,从而使消费者能够理解不一致的新产品的可能性。作者研究了认知灵活性的三种操作-积极影响,未来(相对于过去)发布描述和认知灵活性启动-对新产品评估的影响。四个实验的结果表明,这些因素通过促进新产品的理解能力,提高了参与者对极不一致的新产品的评价。结果还表明,对极新产品所提供的好处的理解,而不是对分辨率产生的影响,导致对这些产品的更高评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信