Horizontal Coal Seam Gas Well Orientation Optimization: The Impact of Stress Regime

Erfan Saber, Q. Qu, S. Aminossadati, Zhongwei Chen
{"title":"Horizontal Coal Seam Gas Well Orientation Optimization: The Impact of Stress Regime","authors":"Erfan Saber, Q. Qu, S. Aminossadati, Zhongwei Chen","doi":"10.2118/210647-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Horizontal boreholes have been routinely applied to coal seams as a cost-effective way to maximize coal seam gas production. However, these wells can encounter severe instability issues during field development due to significant horizontal stress loss and change in deviatoric stresses acting on the borehole. In this work, a general dual-porosity dual-permeability model is established and assigned to a coupled gas flow and coal deformation numerical model to investigate permeability change and borehole break-out regarding different in-situ stress regimes around a horizontal borehole. Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is used in this model.\n The results show that drilling parallel to the maximum horizontal stress direction neither achieves the best stability of the borehole nor maximizes the permeability ratio. Drilling along the minimum horizontal stress direction would maximize the permeability ratio, but it has the worst stability. The optimal drilling direction window considering both permeability ratio and borehole stability is recommended to be between 45– 60°.","PeriodicalId":151564,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, October 17, 2022","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, October 17, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210647-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Horizontal boreholes have been routinely applied to coal seams as a cost-effective way to maximize coal seam gas production. However, these wells can encounter severe instability issues during field development due to significant horizontal stress loss and change in deviatoric stresses acting on the borehole. In this work, a general dual-porosity dual-permeability model is established and assigned to a coupled gas flow and coal deformation numerical model to investigate permeability change and borehole break-out regarding different in-situ stress regimes around a horizontal borehole. Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is used in this model. The results show that drilling parallel to the maximum horizontal stress direction neither achieves the best stability of the borehole nor maximizes the permeability ratio. Drilling along the minimum horizontal stress direction would maximize the permeability ratio, but it has the worst stability. The optimal drilling direction window considering both permeability ratio and borehole stability is recommended to be between 45– 60°.
应力状态对水平煤层气井定向优化的影响
水平钻孔作为一种经济有效的提高煤层气产量的方法,已被常规应用于煤层。然而,由于水平应力损失和井眼偏应力的变化,这些井在现场开发过程中可能会遇到严重的不稳定问题。本文建立了一种通用的双孔双渗模型,并将其赋与瓦斯流动和煤体变形耦合数值模型,研究了水平钻孔周围不同地应力状态下的渗透率变化和井眼突出。该模型采用Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则。结果表明,沿最大水平应力方向平行钻井既不能获得最佳井眼稳定性,也不能获得最大渗透率;沿最小水平应力方向钻进,渗透率比最大,但稳定性最差。综合考虑渗透率和井眼稳定性的最佳钻进方向窗为45°~ 60°。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信