Improving Bug Triaging with High Confidence Predictions at Ericsson

Aindrila Sarkar, Peter C. Rigby, Béla Bartalos
{"title":"Improving Bug Triaging with High Confidence Predictions at Ericsson","authors":"Aindrila Sarkar, Peter C. Rigby, Béla Bartalos","doi":"10.1109/ICSME.2019.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correctly assigning bugs to the right developer or team, i.e. bug triaging, is a costly activity. A concerted effort at Ericsson has been done to adopt automated bug triaging to reduce development costs. In this work, we replicate the research approaches that have been widely used in the literature. We apply them on over 10k bug reports for 9 large products at Ericsson. We find that a logistic regression classifier including the simple textual and categorical attributes of the bug reports has the highest precision and recall of 78.09% and 79.00%, respectively. Ericsson's bug reports often contain logs that have crash dumps and alarms. We add this information to the bug triage models. We find that this information does not improve the precision and recall of bug triaging in Ericsson's context. Although our models perform as well as the best ones reported in the literature, a criticism of bug triaging at Ericsson is that the accuracy is not sufficient for regular use. We develop a novel approach where we only triage bugs when the model has high confidence in the triage prediction. We find that we improve the accuracy to 90%, but we can make predictions for 62% of the bug reports.","PeriodicalId":106748,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2019.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Correctly assigning bugs to the right developer or team, i.e. bug triaging, is a costly activity. A concerted effort at Ericsson has been done to adopt automated bug triaging to reduce development costs. In this work, we replicate the research approaches that have been widely used in the literature. We apply them on over 10k bug reports for 9 large products at Ericsson. We find that a logistic regression classifier including the simple textual and categorical attributes of the bug reports has the highest precision and recall of 78.09% and 79.00%, respectively. Ericsson's bug reports often contain logs that have crash dumps and alarms. We add this information to the bug triage models. We find that this information does not improve the precision and recall of bug triaging in Ericsson's context. Although our models perform as well as the best ones reported in the literature, a criticism of bug triaging at Ericsson is that the accuracy is not sufficient for regular use. We develop a novel approach where we only triage bugs when the model has high confidence in the triage prediction. We find that we improve the accuracy to 90%, but we can make predictions for 62% of the bug reports.
改进Bug分类与爱立信的高可信度预测
将错误正确地分配给正确的开发人员或团队,即错误分类,是一项代价高昂的活动。在爱立信,人们齐心协力采用自动化的bug分类来降低开发成本。在这项工作中,我们复制了文献中广泛使用的研究方法。我们将它们应用于爱立信9个大型产品的1万多个bug报告中。我们发现包含bug报告的简单文本属性和分类属性的逻辑回归分类器具有最高的准确率和召回率,分别为78.09%和79.00%。爱立信的bug报告通常包含有崩溃转储和警报的日志。我们将这些信息添加到bug分类模型中。我们发现,这些信息并没有提高爱立信环境中错误分类的准确性和召回率。尽管我们的模型表现得和文献中报道的最好的模型一样好,但是对爱立信bug分类的批评是,其准确性不足以满足常规使用。我们开发了一种新的方法,当模型对分类预测有很高的信心时,我们只对错误进行分类。我们发现我们将准确率提高到了90%,但是我们可以对62%的bug报告进行预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信