Development as Erasure and The Politics of Protest: A Study of the Lepcha Protest Against Dzongu Hydel Project in North Sikkim

J. Pradhan, U. Adhikari
{"title":"Development as Erasure and The Politics of Protest: A Study of the Lepcha Protest Against Dzongu Hydel Project in North Sikkim","authors":"J. Pradhan, U. Adhikari","doi":"10.5958/J.0974-5041.5.1.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyses the conflict surrounding the construction of hydropower projects along the Teesta River valley in (Dzongu area) in North Sikkim. In particular, the work examines various repertoires of resistance employed by the ACT (Affected Citizens of Teesta in general and the indigenous Lepcha Community in particular against the construction of dams in the Dzongu region in Sikkim. Various spaces, particularly cultural, ecological, and political erasure are endangered by the construction of dams across Teesta and the ACT articulates resistance, and engages in constructive development alternatives, in each of these spaces. The discursive articulations of resistance provide a crucial counterpoint to material expressions of struggle. Discursive resistance takes the form of academic analyses and tribal testimonials. Utilizing Warren's concept of testimonials, which has been used by Paul Routledge in his analysis of the Narmada struggle, the study argues that movement identity articulates a unity that effaces internal difference, contradiction, and ambiguity. The paper concludes with some thoughts on the role of academics in highlighting such ambiguities, in the context of collaboration with social movements.","PeriodicalId":210568,"journal":{"name":"Quest-The Journal of UGC-ASC Nainital","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest-The Journal of UGC-ASC Nainital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/J.0974-5041.5.1.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses the conflict surrounding the construction of hydropower projects along the Teesta River valley in (Dzongu area) in North Sikkim. In particular, the work examines various repertoires of resistance employed by the ACT (Affected Citizens of Teesta in general and the indigenous Lepcha Community in particular against the construction of dams in the Dzongu region in Sikkim. Various spaces, particularly cultural, ecological, and political erasure are endangered by the construction of dams across Teesta and the ACT articulates resistance, and engages in constructive development alternatives, in each of these spaces. The discursive articulations of resistance provide a crucial counterpoint to material expressions of struggle. Discursive resistance takes the form of academic analyses and tribal testimonials. Utilizing Warren's concept of testimonials, which has been used by Paul Routledge in his analysis of the Narmada struggle, the study argues that movement identity articulates a unity that effaces internal difference, contradiction, and ambiguity. The paper concludes with some thoughts on the role of academics in highlighting such ambiguities, in the context of collaboration with social movements.
作为擦除的发展与抗议政治——对锡金北部宗古水电项目的莱差抗议活动的研究
本文分析了锡金北部(宗古地区)提斯塔河流域水电项目建设的冲突。特别地,这项工作考察了ACT (Teesta的受影响公民,特别是当地的Lepcha社区)对锡金Dzongu地区水坝建设的各种抵制行为。各种空间,特别是文化、生态和政治上的抹除,都受到了横跨Teesta的大坝建设的威胁,ACT在每个空间中表达了抵制,并参与了建设性的发展替代方案。抵抗的话语表达为斗争的物质表达提供了一个关键的对应物。话语抵抗采取学术分析和部落证言的形式。利用沃伦的证言概念,保罗·劳特利奇在分析纳尔马达斗争时也使用了这一概念,该研究认为,运动身份阐明了一种消除内部差异、矛盾和模糊性的统一。论文的结论是,在与社会运动合作的背景下,学者在突出这种模糊性方面的作用的一些想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信