The Future of Transnational Self-Regulation ― Enforcement and Compliance in Professional Services

Panos Delimatsis
{"title":"The Future of Transnational Self-Regulation ― Enforcement and Compliance in Professional Services","authors":"Panos Delimatsis","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2954143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increased expansion of economic activity beyond national borders leads to a shift of regulatory power. Public authorities concede power, explicitly or tacitly, to private bodies, whereas the multilayered ecology of global governance inevitably increases the role of transnational institutional structures. This article examines such developments in the area of professional services. It starts by analyzing the self-regulation phenomenon in professional services and points to examples where professional associations accentuate their unique nature to justify the importance of nonintervention in their internal affairs. Powerful professional associations have been thereby created, which, depending on the services subsector (e.g. legal, engineering or advertising services), are the final masters of access to and practice of a given profession. After a critical review of the most important professional associations at the global level, the article focuses on instances of private enforcement and goes on to examine the role of courts in reviewing such enforcement. In this regard, constitutionality of private enforcement is also examined. Finally, the article refers to the role of antitrust rules in harnessing distortive business practices that professional associations may adopt. The article focuses in particular on instances of private, decentralized enforcement. Whereas no truly transnational private regulation in professional services has yet emerged, it is submitted that the foundations for such a development are being built progressively as a result of borderless activities in this sector and a relatively deferential stance on the side of the State.","PeriodicalId":159491,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Firms & Industries in Transitional Economies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2954143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The increased expansion of economic activity beyond national borders leads to a shift of regulatory power. Public authorities concede power, explicitly or tacitly, to private bodies, whereas the multilayered ecology of global governance inevitably increases the role of transnational institutional structures. This article examines such developments in the area of professional services. It starts by analyzing the self-regulation phenomenon in professional services and points to examples where professional associations accentuate their unique nature to justify the importance of nonintervention in their internal affairs. Powerful professional associations have been thereby created, which, depending on the services subsector (e.g. legal, engineering or advertising services), are the final masters of access to and practice of a given profession. After a critical review of the most important professional associations at the global level, the article focuses on instances of private enforcement and goes on to examine the role of courts in reviewing such enforcement. In this regard, constitutionality of private enforcement is also examined. Finally, the article refers to the role of antitrust rules in harnessing distortive business practices that professional associations may adopt. The article focuses in particular on instances of private, decentralized enforcement. Whereas no truly transnational private regulation in professional services has yet emerged, it is submitted that the foundations for such a development are being built progressively as a result of borderless activities in this sector and a relatively deferential stance on the side of the State.
跨国自我监管的未来-专业服务的执行和合规
经济活动超越国界的日益扩大导致了监管权力的转移。公共当局或明或暗地将权力让渡给私人机构,而全球治理的多层生态不可避免地增加了跨国机构结构的作用。本文考察了专业服务领域的这些发展。本文首先分析了专业服务领域的自我监管现象,并指出了专业协会强调其独特性质以证明不干预其内部事务重要性的例子。因此建立了强大的专业协会,根据服务分部门(如法律、工程或广告服务),这些协会是进入和实践某一专业的最终主人。在对全球最重要的专业协会进行批判性审查之后,本文将重点放在私人执行的实例上,并继续审查法院在审查这种执行方面的作用。在这方面,还审查了私人执法的合宪性。最后,本文提到了反垄断规则在利用专业协会可能采用的扭曲商业行为方面的作用。这篇文章特别关注私人的、分散的执法实例。虽然在专业服务方面尚未出现真正的跨国私人管制,但有人认为,由于这一部门的无国界活动和国家方面相对恭敬的立场,正在逐步建立这种发展的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信