Two-Sided Digital Markets: Disruptive Chance Meets Chicken or Egg Causality Dilemma

Jonas Wanner, Carsten Bauer, Christian Janiesch
{"title":"Two-Sided Digital Markets: Disruptive Chance Meets Chicken or Egg Causality Dilemma","authors":"Jonas Wanner, Carsten Bauer, Christian Janiesch","doi":"10.1109/CBI.2019.00045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital two-sided markets exist in many economic sectors. Well-known successful two-sided markets such as Facebook, Uber, or AirBnB illustrate their huge potential for growth. However, this potential can only be unlocked if the market manages to reach a critical mass of users on both market sides, the provider and the consumer side. Having reached a critical mass, the market attracts further consumers and providers, which in turn strengthens the direct and indirect effect. The problem new markets face is called chicken or egg causality dilemma and there is evidence that it can be approached by using the strategic approaches of network economics. Although there exist evaluations of successful companies regarding their initial strategic approach and problems, there are only few generic recommendations for overcoming the chicken or egg causality dilemma from practice-oriented research. None of those shed light on the combinability of strategic approaches. We attend to this lack of guidance and compile approaches from various sources, which have been used by successful platform operators. Our evaluation is based on published case studies as well as on an expert survey. Our results indicate beneficial combination of strategies as opposed to one-dimensional approaches for different types of two-sided markets.","PeriodicalId":193238,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Digital two-sided markets exist in many economic sectors. Well-known successful two-sided markets such as Facebook, Uber, or AirBnB illustrate their huge potential for growth. However, this potential can only be unlocked if the market manages to reach a critical mass of users on both market sides, the provider and the consumer side. Having reached a critical mass, the market attracts further consumers and providers, which in turn strengthens the direct and indirect effect. The problem new markets face is called chicken or egg causality dilemma and there is evidence that it can be approached by using the strategic approaches of network economics. Although there exist evaluations of successful companies regarding their initial strategic approach and problems, there are only few generic recommendations for overcoming the chicken or egg causality dilemma from practice-oriented research. None of those shed light on the combinability of strategic approaches. We attend to this lack of guidance and compile approaches from various sources, which have been used by successful platform operators. Our evaluation is based on published case studies as well as on an expert survey. Our results indicate beneficial combination of strategies as opposed to one-dimensional approaches for different types of two-sided markets.
双边数字市场:颠覆性机遇遇到鸡生蛋还是蛋生鸡的因果关系困境
数字双边市场存在于许多经济领域。众所周知,成功的双边市场,如Facebook、Uber或AirBnB,说明了它们巨大的增长潜力。然而,这一潜力只有在市场双方(供应商和消费者)都达到临界数量的情况下才能释放出来。在达到临界质量后,市场吸引了更多的消费者和供应商,这反过来又加强了直接和间接的影响。新市场面临的问题被称为先有鸡还是先有蛋的因果关系困境,有证据表明,它可以通过使用网络经济学的战略方法来解决。虽然存在对成功公司的初始战略方法和问题的评价,但从实践导向的研究中,只有很少的通用建议来克服鸡还是蛋的因果关系困境。这些都不能说明战略方法的可组合性。我们注意到缺乏指导,并从各种来源汇编了成功的平台运营商使用的方法。我们的评估是基于已发表的案例研究和专家调查。我们的研究结果表明,对于不同类型的双边市场,有利的策略组合而不是一维方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信