Comparing Hemp Seed Yields (Cannabis sativa L.) of an On-Farm Scientific Field Experiment to an On-Farm Agronomic Evaluation Under Organic Growing Conditions in Lower Austria

C. Vogl, Gunilla Lissek-Wxsolf, A. Surböck
{"title":"Comparing Hemp Seed Yields (Cannabis sativa L.) of an On-Farm Scientific Field Experiment to an On-Farm Agronomic Evaluation Under Organic Growing Conditions in Lower Austria","authors":"C. Vogl, Gunilla Lissek-Wxsolf, A. Surböck","doi":"10.1300/J237v09n01_05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hemp seed yields of the variety Fedora-19 in an on-farm scientific field experiment on small plots and in an on-farm evaluation in 11 hemp fields under practical organic growing conditions in Lower Austria were compared to give a realistic view of the variability of yields. Dry matter seed yields from the on-farm field experiment ranged from 127 to 143 g m−2. Under practical growing conditions, yields ranged from 34 to 151 g m−2 in the sample plots. The reported hemp seed yield after combine harvesting, drying, and cleaning was between 324 kg ha−1 and 717 kg ha−1. The results of the experiment show that harvesting by hand considerably influences yields. Yields of the manual harvest in sample plots indicate a high correlation with yields harvested by the combine harvester (R2 = 0.91). The commercial yield is 71% of the yields recorded in sample plots in the fields. Our data questions the transfer of results and conclusions drawn from the data of scientific field experiments that employ manual harvest to that of practical circumstances, and support the notion of on-farm research.","PeriodicalId":319023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Hemp","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Hemp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J237v09n01_05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract Hemp seed yields of the variety Fedora-19 in an on-farm scientific field experiment on small plots and in an on-farm evaluation in 11 hemp fields under practical organic growing conditions in Lower Austria were compared to give a realistic view of the variability of yields. Dry matter seed yields from the on-farm field experiment ranged from 127 to 143 g m−2. Under practical growing conditions, yields ranged from 34 to 151 g m−2 in the sample plots. The reported hemp seed yield after combine harvesting, drying, and cleaning was between 324 kg ha−1 and 717 kg ha−1. The results of the experiment show that harvesting by hand considerably influences yields. Yields of the manual harvest in sample plots indicate a high correlation with yields harvested by the combine harvester (R2 = 0.91). The commercial yield is 71% of the yields recorded in sample plots in the fields. Our data questions the transfer of results and conclusions drawn from the data of scientific field experiments that employ manual harvest to that of practical circumstances, and support the notion of on-farm research.
下奥地利有机种植条件下农场科学田间试验与农场农艺评价的大麻种子产量比较
摘要:本文通过对Fedora-19品种在下奥地利州11块大麻田的小块田间科学试验和实际有机种植条件下的田间评价,比较了其产量的变异性。田间试验的干物质种子产量为127 ~ 143 g m−2。在实际生长条件下,样品地块的产量为34 ~ 151 g m−2。据报道,联合收获、干燥和清洗后的大麻种子产量在324 ~ 717 kg ha - 1之间。试验结果表明,手工采收对产量影响较大。样地人工收获产量与联合收割机收获产量呈高度相关(R2 = 0.91)。商业产量是田间样块记录产量的71%。我们的数据质疑将人工收获的科学田间实验数据得出的结果和结论转移到实际情况下的结果和结论,并支持农场研究的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信