{"title":"Land Acquisition and Dispossession in India","authors":"D. Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190277727.013.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary India is among the top seven countries in the world witnessing the rise of mega urban regions, infrastructural expansion by government and private entities, and acceleration of special economic zones; the fallout of these trends has been the loss of cropland, and massive resistance coupled with political destabilization. Since the 1990s India’s political economy has increasingly been defined by land dispossession. Indeed, some politicians and big industrialists argue that the developmental agenda of India remains an unfulfilled dream because of land scarcity. On the other hand, strong grass-roots protest movements against land grab have toppled reigning governments and, in some cases, managed to thwart the outward march of land capitalization, dispossession, and ecological degradation. Land ownership remains a protean issue for Indian politics and its social matrix. Yet, it is not a recent phenomenon.\n Land acquisition and dispossession have a long genealogy in India and have gone through successive stages, engendering new political modalities within different economic regimes. Although not a settler colony, the East India Company grabbed land from the 18th century onward, dispossessing and uprooting people in the process, while alienating and disembedding land from its social matrix. Beginning with the Permanent Settlement of agricultural lands in eastern India in 1793, the Company sought legal authority to justify taking land, thus initiating a regime of quasi-eminent domain claims upon land for a wide range of practices, among them salt manufacturing, urbanization, infrastructure, and railways. The political authority and dubious legitimacy of the joint-stock company acting as a trustee of land was written into the various laws on land acquisition, ultimately culminating in the colonial Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894. While independent India envisioned distributive justice through land redistribution, land acquisition and dispossession continued unabated, and postcolonial India’s land acquisition law merely offered procedural legitimacy to the act of taking land from people against their will for the greater “public,” and thereafter for public–private partnership. From 1947 state-led development resulted in the expropriation of land for industrialization, dams, and mega-infrastructural projects resulting in massive development-induced displacement across the country. India’s economic liberalization from the 1990s began a transnational movement of capital on an unprecedented scale, which manifested itself as an emerging configuration of real-estate-as-development. The government of India created new legal entitlements for private companies by enacting the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Act in 2005 for export industries, IT companies, mining companies, and supporting real-estate development, resulting in dispossession, resistance, land speculation, and the emergence of land mafias.","PeriodicalId":270501,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190277727.013.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Contemporary India is among the top seven countries in the world witnessing the rise of mega urban regions, infrastructural expansion by government and private entities, and acceleration of special economic zones; the fallout of these trends has been the loss of cropland, and massive resistance coupled with political destabilization. Since the 1990s India’s political economy has increasingly been defined by land dispossession. Indeed, some politicians and big industrialists argue that the developmental agenda of India remains an unfulfilled dream because of land scarcity. On the other hand, strong grass-roots protest movements against land grab have toppled reigning governments and, in some cases, managed to thwart the outward march of land capitalization, dispossession, and ecological degradation. Land ownership remains a protean issue for Indian politics and its social matrix. Yet, it is not a recent phenomenon.
Land acquisition and dispossession have a long genealogy in India and have gone through successive stages, engendering new political modalities within different economic regimes. Although not a settler colony, the East India Company grabbed land from the 18th century onward, dispossessing and uprooting people in the process, while alienating and disembedding land from its social matrix. Beginning with the Permanent Settlement of agricultural lands in eastern India in 1793, the Company sought legal authority to justify taking land, thus initiating a regime of quasi-eminent domain claims upon land for a wide range of practices, among them salt manufacturing, urbanization, infrastructure, and railways. The political authority and dubious legitimacy of the joint-stock company acting as a trustee of land was written into the various laws on land acquisition, ultimately culminating in the colonial Land Acquisition Act (LAA) of 1894. While independent India envisioned distributive justice through land redistribution, land acquisition and dispossession continued unabated, and postcolonial India’s land acquisition law merely offered procedural legitimacy to the act of taking land from people against their will for the greater “public,” and thereafter for public–private partnership. From 1947 state-led development resulted in the expropriation of land for industrialization, dams, and mega-infrastructural projects resulting in massive development-induced displacement across the country. India’s economic liberalization from the 1990s began a transnational movement of capital on an unprecedented scale, which manifested itself as an emerging configuration of real-estate-as-development. The government of India created new legal entitlements for private companies by enacting the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Act in 2005 for export industries, IT companies, mining companies, and supporting real-estate development, resulting in dispossession, resistance, land speculation, and the emergence of land mafias.
当代印度是世界七大国家之一,见证了超大城市地区的崛起,政府和私人实体的基础设施扩张,以及经济特区的加速发展;这些趋势的后果是农田的流失,大规模的抵抗加上政治的不稳定。自20世纪90年代以来,印度的政治经济日益被土地剥夺所定义。事实上,一些政治家和大实业家认为,由于土地稀缺,印度的发展议程仍然是一个未实现的梦想。另一方面,强烈的反对土地掠夺的基层抗议运动推翻了执政政府,在某些情况下,成功地阻止了土地资本化、剥夺和生态退化的向外扩张。对于印度的政治和社会矩阵来说,土地所有权仍然是一个多变的问题。然而,这不是最近才出现的现象。在印度,土地征用和剥夺有着悠久的历史,经历了连续的阶段,在不同的经济制度下产生了新的政治模式。虽然不是一个移民殖民地,但东印度公司从18世纪开始夺取土地,在这个过程中剥夺和连根拔起人们,同时疏远和脱离土地的社会矩阵。从1793年印度东部农业土地的永久定居开始,公司寻求法律权威来证明土地征用的合理性,从而启动了一个准征用权要求制度,对土地进行广泛的实践,其中包括制盐,城市化,基础设施和铁路。作为土地受托人的股份公司的政治权威和可疑的合法性被写入各种土地征用法律,最终在1894年的《殖民地土地征用法》(LAA)中达到高潮。虽然独立的印度设想通过土地再分配来实现分配正义,但土地征用和剥夺仍然有增无减,后殖民时期印度的土地征用法仅仅为违背人民意愿从他们手中夺取土地的行为提供了程序上的合法性,以实现更大的“公共”,以及此后的公私合作关系。从1947年开始,国家主导的发展导致了土地被征用,用于工业化、水坝和大型基础设施项目,导致了全国范围内由发展引起的大规模流离失所。印度从20世纪90年代开始的经济自由化开始了前所未有规模的跨国资本流动,这表现为新兴的房地产开发配置。印度政府于2005年颁布了《经济特区法》(Special Economic Zone Act),为私营企业创造了新的法律权利,适用于出口行业、IT公司、矿业公司和支持房地产开发,导致了剥夺、抵抗、土地投机和土地黑手党的出现。