Inertial characteristics of upper extremity motions in upper extremity stroke rehabilitation based tasks

M. L. Delva, C. Menon
{"title":"Inertial characteristics of upper extremity motions in upper extremity stroke rehabilitation based tasks","authors":"M. L. Delva, C. Menon","doi":"10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Activity counting has demonstrated strong correlations to recovery before and after stroke rehabilitation. However, there are only moderate to poor correlations with movement specific features (such as timing and repetition) that are significant to stroke rehabilitation, allowing room for improvement. This paper explores the physical meaning of an accelerometric based activity count, by using a precise tri-axial accelerometer and tri-axial gyroscope during tasks based on selected activities of daily living (ADLs). The impact of processing algorithms and sensor choice were also considered. Nine healthy participants performed a series of free-world upper extremity movement tasks modelled after ADLs as well as tasks constrained by speed and direction. Raw gyroscope and accelerometer data were linearly regressed with medically graded actigraphy bands for comparison. The results demonstrated that wrist motion during upper extremity tasks had similar distributions of data across all planes and axes of motion. The results also highlighted that processing algorithms based on mean and median epoched data were more sensitive (p <; 0.05) to differences in planes and axes of motion, but that variance based methods presented lower root-mean-square-errors (RMSE) errors when linearly regressed with medically graded technology. The findings from this study help to better understand inertial patterns of upper extremity rehabilitation based tasks and physical interpretations of activity count measures.","PeriodicalId":235222,"journal":{"name":"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Activity counting has demonstrated strong correlations to recovery before and after stroke rehabilitation. However, there are only moderate to poor correlations with movement specific features (such as timing and repetition) that are significant to stroke rehabilitation, allowing room for improvement. This paper explores the physical meaning of an accelerometric based activity count, by using a precise tri-axial accelerometer and tri-axial gyroscope during tasks based on selected activities of daily living (ADLs). The impact of processing algorithms and sensor choice were also considered. Nine healthy participants performed a series of free-world upper extremity movement tasks modelled after ADLs as well as tasks constrained by speed and direction. Raw gyroscope and accelerometer data were linearly regressed with medically graded actigraphy bands for comparison. The results demonstrated that wrist motion during upper extremity tasks had similar distributions of data across all planes and axes of motion. The results also highlighted that processing algorithms based on mean and median epoched data were more sensitive (p <; 0.05) to differences in planes and axes of motion, but that variance based methods presented lower root-mean-square-errors (RMSE) errors when linearly regressed with medically graded technology. The findings from this study help to better understand inertial patterns of upper extremity rehabilitation based tasks and physical interpretations of activity count measures.
上肢卒中康复任务中上肢运动的惯性特征
活动计数与中风康复前后的恢复有很强的相关性。然而,对中风康复有重要意义的特定运动特征(如时间和重复)只有中等到较差的相关性,有改进的空间。本文探讨了基于活动计数的加速度计的物理意义,通过使用精确的三轴加速度计和三轴陀螺仪在基于选定的日常生活活动(ADLs)的任务中进行计数。同时考虑了处理算法和传感器选择的影响。9名健康参与者完成了一系列模拟ADLs的自由世界上肢运动任务,以及受速度和方向限制的任务。原始陀螺仪和加速度计数据与医学分级的活动仪带线性回归进行比较。结果表明,上肢任务中的手腕运动在所有平面和运动轴上具有相似的数据分布。结果还表明,基于平均和中位数epoch数据的处理算法更敏感(p <;0.05)对运动平面和运动轴差异的影响,但基于方差的方法在与医学分级技术线性回归时具有较低的均方根误差(RMSE)。这项研究的发现有助于更好地理解基于上肢康复任务的惯性模式和活动计数测量的物理解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信