{"title":"Possibilities of psychological diagnosis of social intelligence in the context of life course","authors":"V. Shevelev, E. Korjova","doi":"10.21638/spbu16.2019.307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"В изучаются психометрические используемых в исследовании методик. В частности, были обнаружены неудовлетворительные психометрические свойства в тесте «Диагностика уровня развития способности к адекватной интерпретации для диагностики помощью факторно-го анализа (ЭФА) была This article deals with the subject characteristics of the personal life course of people with different levels of social intelligence. The social intelligence and subjective characteristics of individuals’ life course (life orientations, subjective picture of life course, life course strategies) are studied. The sample group was composed of external students of the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia aged 19–48 ( n = 73; μ = 26.18; σ = 6.93; male — 25, female — 48). Research methods included different tests and questionnaires measuring the degree of mani-festation of various aspects of social intelligence (Tromso Social Intelligence Scale, TSIS, Silvera D. H., Martinussen M. & Dahl T. I., translated by V. Y. Semenov, edited by A. A. Alekseev); Guilford’s Test of Social intelligence; the method called “Diagnostics of the level of development of abilities for an adequate interpretation of nonverbal behavior” (V. A. Labunskaya); the author’s questionnaire “The significance of social intelligence in a person’s life trajectory” (V. V. Shevelev). For the diagnosis of the subject characteristics of a person’s life course, we se-lected the following methods: “Questionnaire of subject-object orientations in life situations” (E. Yu. Korjova); methods “Psychological Autobiography” (E. Yu. Korjova) and “The indica-tor of coping strategies” (adapted by D. Amirkhan). In addition, we researched the most im-portant psychometric characteristics of the psychological tests used. In particular there were some unsatisfactory psychometric characteristics discovered in J. P. Guilford’s Test of Social Intelligence and V. A. Labunskaya’s test to diagnose ability to perceive non-verbal human be-havior. Using the EFA, a three-factor structure of social intelligence was found. It was shown that these factors have different correlations with subjective characteristics of personal life courses depending on the individual’s level of social intelligence.","PeriodicalId":388528,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2019.307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
В изучаются психометрические используемых в исследовании методик. В частности, были обнаружены неудовлетворительные психометрические свойства в тесте «Диагностика уровня развития способности к адекватной интерпретации для диагностики помощью факторно-го анализа (ЭФА) была This article deals with the subject characteristics of the personal life course of people with different levels of social intelligence. The social intelligence and subjective characteristics of individuals’ life course (life orientations, subjective picture of life course, life course strategies) are studied. The sample group was composed of external students of the Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia aged 19–48 ( n = 73; μ = 26.18; σ = 6.93; male — 25, female — 48). Research methods included different tests and questionnaires measuring the degree of mani-festation of various aspects of social intelligence (Tromso Social Intelligence Scale, TSIS, Silvera D. H., Martinussen M. & Dahl T. I., translated by V. Y. Semenov, edited by A. A. Alekseev); Guilford’s Test of Social intelligence; the method called “Diagnostics of the level of development of abilities for an adequate interpretation of nonverbal behavior” (V. A. Labunskaya); the author’s questionnaire “The significance of social intelligence in a person’s life trajectory” (V. V. Shevelev). For the diagnosis of the subject characteristics of a person’s life course, we se-lected the following methods: “Questionnaire of subject-object orientations in life situations” (E. Yu. Korjova); methods “Psychological Autobiography” (E. Yu. Korjova) and “The indica-tor of coping strategies” (adapted by D. Amirkhan). In addition, we researched the most im-portant psychometric characteristics of the psychological tests used. In particular there were some unsatisfactory psychometric characteristics discovered in J. P. Guilford’s Test of Social Intelligence and V. A. Labunskaya’s test to diagnose ability to perceive non-verbal human be-havior. Using the EFA, a three-factor structure of social intelligence was found. It was shown that these factors have different correlations with subjective characteristics of personal life courses depending on the individual’s level of social intelligence.
В изучаются психометрические используемых в исследовании методик.В частности、были обнаружены неудовлетворительные психометрические свойства в тесте "Диагностика уровня развития способности к адекватной интерпретации для диагностики помощью факторно-го анализа (ЭФА) была 本文论述了具有不同社会智力水平的人的个人生活过程的主题特征。研究了社会智力和个人生命历程的主观特征(生命取向、生命历程的主观图景、生命历程策略)。样本组由俄罗斯赫尔岑国立师范大学 19-48 岁的外校学生组成(n = 73;μ = 26.18;σ = 6.93;男 - 25,女 - 48)。研究方法包括不同的测试和问卷,测量社会智力各方面的人际关系程度(特罗姆瑟社会智力测验量表,TSIS, Silvera D. H., Martinussen M. & Dahl T. I., V. Y. Semen 翻译)、谢韦列夫)。为了诊断一个人生活轨迹的主体特征,我们选择了以下方法:"生活中主客体取向问卷"(E. Yu. Korjova);"心理自传"(E. Yu. Korjova)和 "应对策略指示器"(D. Amirkhan 改编)。此外,我们还研究了所用心理测试最重要的心理测量特征。特别是在 J. P. Guilford 的社会智力测验和 V. A. Labunskaya 的人类非语言行为感知能力诊断测试中发现了一些不尽人意的心理特征。通过 EFA,发现了社会智力的三因素结构。结果表明,根据个人的社会智力水平,这些因素与个人生活课程的主观特征具有不同的相关性。