Practical Interstellar Probe Concepts: Mission Study Results

J. Kinnison, Alice Corcoros, D. Napolillo, D. Mehoke, G. Rogers, F. Siddique, A. Haapala-Chalk, W. Schlei, D. Copeland, R. Ashtari
{"title":"Practical Interstellar Probe Concepts: Mission Study Results","authors":"J. Kinnison, Alice Corcoros, D. Napolillo, D. Mehoke, G. Rogers, F. Siddique, A. Haapala-Chalk, W. Schlei, D. Copeland, R. Ashtari","doi":"10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the beginning of space exploration, humans have looked forward to escaping the solar system into interstellar space. As early as 1958, before NASA was established, mission concepts for an Interstellar Probe have been proposed. None have been attempted, mainly because the technologies required to do this mission have not been developed. However, with the development of the Space Launch System (SLS), the main difficulty - how to launch a system with the necessary speed to reach interstellar space in a reasonable time - has been addressed. In 2018, NASA asked The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory to develop a practical near-term mission concept that could finally achieve the goal of exploring interstellar space. In this study, we have identified three classes of trajectories that could achieve an escape speed of greater than 7 Astronomical Units (AU)/year, about twice the speed of the Voyager spacecraft which allows for transit into interstellar space well within a 50-year mission lifetime. These trajectory classes are: (i) launch on SLS with solid rocket motor upper stage followed by a ballistic Jupiter gravity assist, (ii) SLS launch followed by a powered Jupiter gravity assist (JGA) using a solid-rocket motor fired at Jupiter, and (iii) SLS launch followed by a JGA to target a deep dive into the Sun's gravity well for a Solar Oberth Maneuver (SOM) to achieve escape velocity. Each of these trajectory classes imposes significant requirements on the launch vehicle and spacecraft, and represents increasing levels of risk and difficulty. The powered JGA trajectory class would require carrying a large solid rocket motor to Jupiter such that it can successfully fire during the Jupiter flyby, which imposes requirements on thermal control of the system, as well as the ability to target the flyby accurately with a significantly larger flight system than for the unpowered JGA option. The SOM trajectory option imposes even more difficult requirements on the flight system, given that the maneuver requires a closest approach of 3–4 solar radii (Rs) to achieve a significant escape speed. This perihelion is well beyond that planned for Parker Solar Probe, and will require a heat shield capable of withstanding even higher temperatures than existing heat shields. Preliminary development work in this area has provided a potential path forward, which we have used to develop a heat shield design that can be employed to study whether such a mission is possible, the constraints and requirements on the flight system, and risks associated with an SOM mission concept. In this work, we present the three trajectory classes and associated example flight system configurations. We compare two example mission concepts along with science goals for each one, discussing the advantages and risks of both. We conclude by identifying the mission concept that represents the best option for a practical Interstellar Probe.","PeriodicalId":219988,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the beginning of space exploration, humans have looked forward to escaping the solar system into interstellar space. As early as 1958, before NASA was established, mission concepts for an Interstellar Probe have been proposed. None have been attempted, mainly because the technologies required to do this mission have not been developed. However, with the development of the Space Launch System (SLS), the main difficulty - how to launch a system with the necessary speed to reach interstellar space in a reasonable time - has been addressed. In 2018, NASA asked The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory to develop a practical near-term mission concept that could finally achieve the goal of exploring interstellar space. In this study, we have identified three classes of trajectories that could achieve an escape speed of greater than 7 Astronomical Units (AU)/year, about twice the speed of the Voyager spacecraft which allows for transit into interstellar space well within a 50-year mission lifetime. These trajectory classes are: (i) launch on SLS with solid rocket motor upper stage followed by a ballistic Jupiter gravity assist, (ii) SLS launch followed by a powered Jupiter gravity assist (JGA) using a solid-rocket motor fired at Jupiter, and (iii) SLS launch followed by a JGA to target a deep dive into the Sun's gravity well for a Solar Oberth Maneuver (SOM) to achieve escape velocity. Each of these trajectory classes imposes significant requirements on the launch vehicle and spacecraft, and represents increasing levels of risk and difficulty. The powered JGA trajectory class would require carrying a large solid rocket motor to Jupiter such that it can successfully fire during the Jupiter flyby, which imposes requirements on thermal control of the system, as well as the ability to target the flyby accurately with a significantly larger flight system than for the unpowered JGA option. The SOM trajectory option imposes even more difficult requirements on the flight system, given that the maneuver requires a closest approach of 3–4 solar radii (Rs) to achieve a significant escape speed. This perihelion is well beyond that planned for Parker Solar Probe, and will require a heat shield capable of withstanding even higher temperatures than existing heat shields. Preliminary development work in this area has provided a potential path forward, which we have used to develop a heat shield design that can be employed to study whether such a mission is possible, the constraints and requirements on the flight system, and risks associated with an SOM mission concept. In this work, we present the three trajectory classes and associated example flight system configurations. We compare two example mission concepts along with science goals for each one, discussing the advantages and risks of both. We conclude by identifying the mission concept that represents the best option for a practical Interstellar Probe.
实用星际探测器概念:任务研究结果
从太空探索开始,人类就期待着逃离太阳系进入星际空间。早在1958年,美国国家航空航天局成立之前,就提出了星际探测器的任务概念。没有人尝试过,主要是因为完成这项任务所需的技术还没有发展出来。然而,随着空间发射系统(SLS)的发展,如何在合理的时间内以必要的速度发射系统到达星际空间的主要困难已经得到解决。2018年,美国宇航局要求约翰霍普金斯大学应用物理实验室开发一个实用的近期任务概念,最终实现探索星际空间的目标。在这项研究中,我们已经确定了三种类型的轨道,它们可以实现大于7天文单位(AU)/年的逃逸速度,大约是旅行者号航天器速度的两倍,它允许在50年的任务寿命内进入星际空间。这些轨道类别是:(i)在SLS上发射,固体火箭发动机上一级,然后是弹道木星重力辅助;(ii) SLS发射,然后是动力木星重力辅助(JGA),使用固体火箭发动机向木星发射;(iii) SLS发射,然后是JGA,目标是深度潜入太阳重力井,进行太阳Oberth机动(SOM),以达到逃逸速度。这些轨道类别中的每一种都对运载火箭和航天器提出了重要的要求,并且代表着不断增加的风险和难度。动力JGA弹道级将需要携带一个大型固体火箭发动机到木星,这样它可以在木星飞越期间成功发射,这对系统的热控制施加了要求,以及与无动力JGA选项相比,使用显着更大的飞行系统精确瞄准飞越的能力。SOM弹道选项对飞行系统提出了更困难的要求,因为机动需要最接近3-4个太阳半径(Rs)以达到显着的逃逸速度。这个近日点远远超出了帕克太阳探测器的计划,并且需要一个能够承受比现有隔热罩更高温度的隔热罩。该领域的初步开发工作已经提供了一条潜在的前进道路,我们已经使用它来开发隔热板设计,可以用来研究这样的任务是否可能,飞行系统的限制和要求,以及与SOM任务概念相关的风险。在这项工作中,我们提出了三种轨迹类和相关的示例飞行系统配置。我们比较了两个示例任务概念以及每个任务的科学目标,讨论了两者的优势和风险。最后,我们确定了代表实际星际探测器最佳选择的任务概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信