Can We Get an Intervention, Please? The Utility of Teaming Interventions on Engineering Design Student Psychological Safety

Samantha Scarpinella, C. Cole, Sarah C. Ritter, Susan Mohammed, K. Jablokow, Scarlett R. Miller
{"title":"Can We Get an Intervention, Please? The Utility of Teaming Interventions on Engineering Design Student Psychological Safety","authors":"Samantha Scarpinella, C. Cole, Sarah C. Ritter, Susan Mohammed, K. Jablokow, Scarlett R. Miller","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-90009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Research on psychological safety has been growing in recent years due to its role in promoting creativity and innovation, among other items. This is because teams with high levels of psychological safety feel safe to express ideas and opinions. While we are becoming more aware of the importance of psychological safety in teaming, there is limited evidence in how to facilitate or build it within teams, particularly in an educational context. This paper was developed to respond to this research void by identifying the impact of teaming interventions aimed at improving psychological safety in engineering design student teams. Specifically, we studied two cohorts of students in a cornerstone design class (N = 414 students), one who received a series of video interventions and introduced role playing (intervention) and one who did not (control). These role assignments — referred to as the Lenses of Psychologically Safety — were created to promote key leadership attributes that have been shown to be crucial in facilitating psychologically safe teams. To compare the utility of the intervention, Psychological Safety was gathered at 5 key time points of a multi-week design project. The results identified three key findings. First, the interventions were successful in increasing psychological safety in engineering teams. In addition, the results indicated the utility of the Lenses of Psychological Safety throughout the design process. Finally, the results identified that groups who used these lenses had higher perceptions of Psychological Safety in their teams. Overall, these results indicated that psychological safety can be improved in engineering education through the intervention methods described within.","PeriodicalId":270086,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research on psychological safety has been growing in recent years due to its role in promoting creativity and innovation, among other items. This is because teams with high levels of psychological safety feel safe to express ideas and opinions. While we are becoming more aware of the importance of psychological safety in teaming, there is limited evidence in how to facilitate or build it within teams, particularly in an educational context. This paper was developed to respond to this research void by identifying the impact of teaming interventions aimed at improving psychological safety in engineering design student teams. Specifically, we studied two cohorts of students in a cornerstone design class (N = 414 students), one who received a series of video interventions and introduced role playing (intervention) and one who did not (control). These role assignments — referred to as the Lenses of Psychologically Safety — were created to promote key leadership attributes that have been shown to be crucial in facilitating psychologically safe teams. To compare the utility of the intervention, Psychological Safety was gathered at 5 key time points of a multi-week design project. The results identified three key findings. First, the interventions were successful in increasing psychological safety in engineering teams. In addition, the results indicated the utility of the Lenses of Psychological Safety throughout the design process. Finally, the results identified that groups who used these lenses had higher perceptions of Psychological Safety in their teams. Overall, these results indicated that psychological safety can be improved in engineering education through the intervention methods described within.
能请你们干预一下吗?团队干预对工程设计学生心理安全的作用
近年来,由于心理安全在促进创造力和创新等方面的作用,对心理安全的研究一直在增长。这是因为心理安全水平高的团队在表达想法和意见时感到安全。虽然我们越来越意识到心理安全在团队中的重要性,但关于如何在团队中促进或建立心理安全的证据有限,特别是在教育背景下。本文旨在通过确定旨在提高工程设计学生团队心理安全的团队干预措施的影响来回应这一研究空白。具体来说,我们研究了基础设计班的两组学生(N = 414名学生),其中一组接受了一系列视频干预并引入了角色扮演(干预),另一组没有(对照组)。这些角色分配——被称为心理安全透镜——被创造出来是为了促进关键的领导属性,这些属性已被证明是促进心理安全团队的关键。为了比较干预的效用,在一个多周设计项目的5个关键时间点收集心理安全。研究结果确定了三个关键发现。首先,干预措施成功地提高了工程团队的心理安全感。此外,结果表明心理安全镜头在整个设计过程中的效用。最后,结果发现,使用这些镜片的小组在他们的团队中有更高的心理安全感。总体而言,这些结果表明,通过本文描述的干预方法,可以改善工程教育中的心理安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信