ELECTRONIC REGISTRY SYSTEM FOR DIABETIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY: DETERMINATION OF COMMON DATA ELEMENTS

Shahram Oliaei, N. Mehrabi, T. Noori, S. Saeidi, E. Mehraeen
{"title":"ELECTRONIC REGISTRY SYSTEM FOR DIABETIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY: DETERMINATION OF COMMON DATA ELEMENTS","authors":"Shahram Oliaei, N. Mehrabi, T. Noori, S. Saeidi, E. Mehraeen","doi":"10.33965/eh2020_202009l007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The advent of electronic registries has increasingly provided an opportunity to improve healthcare services and advanced applied research. However, the delivery of effective hyperbaric technology services requires well-functioning electronic registry systems and patient information integration to support national and global analyses. Objectives: this study aimed to determine the most common data elements of an electronic registry for diabetic patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that conducted in two main stages. The first phase involves a review of the current available evidence on the study aim. In this stage, we searched related articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Up To Date, Science Direct, and Scopus databases. In the next phase, using the researcher-made questionnaire, the essential data elements and technical features of an electronic registry system were validated. The statistical population of the present study consisted of 32 endocrinologists working in Golestan Hospital. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS version 26. Results: Through a full-text review of 12 related articles, the data elements (N=95) of an electronic registry for diabetic patients undergoing HBOT were identified and classified into three categories including: administrative (n=30), clinical (n=54), and technical (n=11). According to findings, among the 30 data elements of administrative category, 25 data elements and in clinical category, 50 data elements were selected by statistical population. Moreover, all identified technical features were selected by experts, except the \"decision making support\". Conclusions: In this study we identified and validated the data elements and technical features of an electronic registry system for HBOT-treated diabetic patients. These requirements make it possible to standardize data collection and improve health care services.","PeriodicalId":393647,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on e-Health (EH2020)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on e-Health (EH2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/eh2020_202009l007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The advent of electronic registries has increasingly provided an opportunity to improve healthcare services and advanced applied research. However, the delivery of effective hyperbaric technology services requires well-functioning electronic registry systems and patient information integration to support national and global analyses. Objectives: this study aimed to determine the most common data elements of an electronic registry for diabetic patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that conducted in two main stages. The first phase involves a review of the current available evidence on the study aim. In this stage, we searched related articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Up To Date, Science Direct, and Scopus databases. In the next phase, using the researcher-made questionnaire, the essential data elements and technical features of an electronic registry system were validated. The statistical population of the present study consisted of 32 endocrinologists working in Golestan Hospital. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive statistics in SPSS version 26. Results: Through a full-text review of 12 related articles, the data elements (N=95) of an electronic registry for diabetic patients undergoing HBOT were identified and classified into three categories including: administrative (n=30), clinical (n=54), and technical (n=11). According to findings, among the 30 data elements of administrative category, 25 data elements and in clinical category, 50 data elements were selected by statistical population. Moreover, all identified technical features were selected by experts, except the "decision making support". Conclusions: In this study we identified and validated the data elements and technical features of an electronic registry system for HBOT-treated diabetic patients. These requirements make it possible to standardize data collection and improve health care services.
接受高压氧治疗的糖尿病患者电子登记系统:共同数据元素的测定
背景:电子注册的出现为改善医疗保健服务和推进应用研究提供了越来越多的机会。然而,提供有效的高压技术服务需要功能良好的电子登记系统和患者信息集成,以支持国家和全球分析。目的:本研究旨在确定接受高压氧治疗(HBOT)的糖尿病患者电子登记的最常见数据元素。方法:这是一项横断面研究,分为两个主要阶段。第一阶段包括对研究目标的现有证据进行审查。在这一阶段,我们在PubMed, Web of Science, Up To Date, Science Direct和Scopus数据库中检索了相关文章。在下一阶段,使用研究人员制作的问卷,验证了电子登记系统的基本数据要素和技术特征。本研究的统计人群包括在Golestan医院工作的32名内分泌学家。收集的数据使用SPSS version 26进行描述性统计分析。结果:通过对12篇相关文章的全文回顾,确定了糖尿病患者HBOT电子登记的数据元素(N=95),并将其分为三类:行政(N= 30)、临床(N= 54)和技术(N= 11)。根据研究结果,在30个行政类数据要素中,25个临床类数据要素中,采用统计总体法选取了50个数据要素。此外,除“决策支持”外,所有确定的技术特征都是由专家选择的。结论:在本研究中,我们确定并验证了hbot治疗糖尿病患者电子注册系统的数据元素和技术特征。这些要求使数据收集标准化和改善保健服务成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信